https://rehold.com/Bend+OR/RIVER+BLUFF+TRL/61165
https://dial.deschutes.org/Real/InteractiveMap/185928
https://neighbor.report/address/61130-Bachelor-View-Rd-Bend-OR-97702-USA/31237776_id/
Holy Cow! The compilation of information is amazing but what is more amazing is the online user feedback comment that can be directed to an individual neighbor.
This link provided links to nearest neighbors. I went to this link because a previous link that I had looked at was a nearest neighbor to this address.
A fantastic intelligence tool that looks at a specific location and says things about that location and the people related to it.
There is no privacy anymore.. Good thing? Bad thing? It all depends!
Some would say this is an invasion of privacy. The website that presents it would certainly be subject to violation. The website is documents the fact of violation if there is a violation......or not. The website owner must be very confident that there is not and that fact is defensible in court!
Wow! The magnitude of this is immense. On the micro level it goes from a specifically identified geo location to all public information related to it. On the macro aggregation level it compiles higher levels of aggregated data for data mining that have the linkage ability to go back down to the micro level and collect all specific data elements that may be related to it.
It aggregates public information found in public silos. Of course! How elegant!
It is a cross silo cutter. This takes me back to Robert Steele!
As an example of cross silo cutting there is linkage of this website to this website:
https://www.locatefamily.com/Street-Lists/USA/OR/97702/index145.html
Might there be an aggregator of a collection of independent websites using the location information business model that uses or sells aggregated data?
What business entity might that be? For what purpose?
The cat is out of the bag. The horse is out of the barn. The genie is out of the bottle and Pandora is out of the box. There is no going back but the inalienable privacy rule says there should be a remedy to take it back.
Sorry about that. It is not inalienable anymore. It was undermined at the most basic level. The citizen that owned it by right owns it no more. What is left of that right that a citizen still owns.
My father explained Freedom of speech to me at a very young age. Maybe the age of reason which was a major concept in a Catholic family. At what age did I become reasonable? Good question. I will evade it with the generality that most get there about 8 or 9 which I think was also the age of Confirmation?
This is how dad explained Free Speech to me: Your right to express yourself with your fist ends at my nose!
Where does personal harm to a person stand today and the protection of society of that right that shall not be infringed in relationship to expressing the personal right of another to express themselves by waving their fist or any other portion of their anatomy like a.......wagging tongue or the an open (unlisted) hand on the most personal private part of a woman?
I have made a huge conceptual leap from the Micro level that started at the beginning of this blog entry to the Macro level that has an address of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC.
There is a meta structure of conceptual Middle Ware in that leap from the micro to the macro level that begs the question: How did thing ever come to this? Maybe the truth is found with intelligence and wisdom. Maybe those are a privilege not a right? The inalienable conceptual nature of the Right exists but the right to use it is on offered privilege to get where we want to go like the privilege of a drivers license?
Interesting conceptual idea there but I will put it in the PlaceHolder cell of my mind.
Backdown the chain of conceptual linkage that I forged in my free range mind this morning to something that is not so big that I can't wrap my mind around it......
The parent website:
https://neighbor.report/
There must obviously be a full range of website legal protection?
Ya think!
This is a look at all the small print at the bottom where the groundwork of a get out of jail free card is laid down. There is where the analyst grunt work is done chopping wood and carrying water.
Chop, chop!
This is at the bottom of the website:
"Neighbor.Report collects publicly available data about addresses, residents, and phone numbers. Neighbor.Report is not a consumer reporting agency. Neighbor.Report records cannot be used to make decisions about employment (including background checks), insurance, housing or tenant screening, or any purpose covered by the FCRA" (I added the link to FCRA)
OK. I self certify that I will not use it for that purpose because I looked at the subjective content of what information is available on the website contributed by anonymous entities. Entities that may or may not be people.....or could be because by definition Companies = People. That is a branch of thought for later thinking!
When it comes to a branch in the road.....take it!
Here is more at the bottom of the website that will take me down those branches.
Genealogy research is so binary compared to this kind of research. If your parents did not have any children then you can't have any either!
https://neighbor.report/about
This boils down to presenting the justification reason, logic and intent of Neighbor.Report. It looks to me like Mission Statement but one based on Fear and protection. Create the Fear and Protection becomes an Opportunity. It is a business model of the Insurance Sector. One that is adopted as and effective leverage tool b other entities.
We live in an increasingly Fear Based world. That is something to be afraid of! Mostly afraid of those that would use it as a manipulative tool for private gain at the expense of creating unreasonable Public Fear.
Good place for a reminder here.
We have nothing to fear but the fear monger business model!
Fear justifies response related to risk. Make the appearance of risk appear to be big and bigger response is necessary. It is simple risk analysis. There is real objective computational risk analysis projection based on historical data and there is subjective risk analysis based on whatever can be chosen to base that subjective analysis.
Is it objectively reasonable and logical to fear something that presents itself as a subjective risk?
I was absolutely terrified as a child of a thing that would come out of the closet in the night that was hiding in the far corner closet of my bedroom. Maybe something that resides down in our reptilian brainstem. We are vulnerable when we sleep and seek protective places to take refuge and sleep. In general I was afraid of the dark. One night when I was 14 (with my parents permission) I went out on my motor bike to a wooded property we owned miles away and slept alone in the woods in an army surplus hammock. I told them it was an adventure for me to go camping. I still love such adventures. Most of my adventures in life have been founded in conquering fear!
My adventures have been big ones!
Back to the woods at age 14.
I knew there was nothing to fear in the woods like ai knew there was nothing to fear in the closet. I could look in it when the lights were on in the bedroom. Nothing there. Nothing would be there. The thing I feared was "The Thing". Really. The real Thing that I had seen in the 1951 movie I saw in 1951. I was 8 years old. There was no Netflix then. Movies were seen in the time period they were produced and not likely to find an audience then after running their course. Why I had seen it then? Alone in a movie at age 8? I went to the movies alone to see the Saturday matinee cliff hangers for 15 cents. Times have changed. They were series then. Perhaps it was a trailer for the "Thing" I saw.
Don't know. Doesn't matter.
I survived sleeping in the woods that night. Kids had more freedom to free range than. We would go out into the woods with our BB guns to hunt bears all day long. Ride our bikes anywhere around the city.
I conquered my fear of the Thing in the closet but was never comfortable sleeping facing the wall until several years later when somehow ai felt more conceptually comfortable in that position. Even if I dd not see the Thing I had once feared, if it was any thing behind my back I could handle it.
I free ranged far and wide on a bike as a kid. I would go into neighborhoods I had never been in before to face the fear of getting lost. I always found the way out. I was never really lost. Since retirement I have actually traveled maybe a couple hundred miles on a bike and was never really lost. Conceptually I sit down at this time in life and ask myself "Where am I in time and space (conceptually, physically) where am I going from that point. Where do I want to go and how am I going to get there.
A good thing to know. How do I know looking ahead?
I don't often look back unless it is a big picture view that is useful to extrapolate future physical and conceptual paths of choice. Generally I avoid the "Been there done that, got the T-Shirt things" unless the places and/or experiences related to them are not simply going to the same place and doing the same thing in the same way over again without any change from the last time I did it.
Where am I at in time and space with the future of what I will write in this blog entry?
Back to bringing the Future I want it to go in into the present and make it mean something in history.....it is all about time travel:
Back to the fork in the road at the bottom of this website
https://neighbor.report
https://neighbor.report/about
https://neighbor.report/content-guidelines
https://neighbor.report/privacy
https://neighbor.report/policy-violations
https://neighbor.report/terms
https://neighbor.report/remove
Also at the bottom which is unusual place to put a basic search which is the utility the website was created for. The following is in fact what the website was created by some entity to do:
Under "Find" at the bottom:
Find People links to this website: http://www.gew3.org/
Search on "gew3"
Find Address links to this website: https://neighbor.report/d/
http://www.gew3.org/ "Not Secure" look to the left of the website address bar (http://www.gew3.org/)
http://gew3.org.websiteoutlook.com
From above site: Page views per day: 2.26 K per day 3.48 K per day returned when Update was pressed.
"Description:
People search directory containing addresses, phone numbers, and public records on millions of Americans"
Server IP
208.76.50.90
Server Location
Clearwater Beach,FL,United States
ISP
Data Subsystems
https://myip.ms/info/whois/208.76.50.90/k/1060195178/website/gew3.org
Popularity: 775 visitors per day
https://www.google.com/maps/embed?origin=mfe&pb=!1m4!2m1!1s28.05,+-82.36!5e0!6i6
https://www.google.com/maps/place/28%C2%B001'48.0%22N+82%C2%B049'12.0%22W/@28.0302439,-82.8187244,27m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x0!8m2!3d28.03!4d-82.82?hl=en-US
https://myip.ms/info/whois/208.76.50.90/k/1060195178/website/gew3.org
Owner Address: 161 Brightwater Dr Apt 1, Clearwater, FL
ALGOMIR LLC
OLEKSIY SHORTOV
https://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Land-O-Lakes/oleksiy-shortov/26915622.aspx
Data Subsystems
https://www.datasub.com
https://www.zoominfo.com/c/data-subsystems-inc/347537991 Revenue:$10 million
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/161-Brightwater-Dr-APT-1-Clearwater-FL-33767/81398063_zpid/
https://www.datasub.com/becomes_data_subsystems/
Sem 360: http://www.sem360.com
Very interesting results when going to this Google Search:
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS806US806&q=+site:gew3.org+gew3&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiDu8yJz6neAhV6JTQIHQb2ADoQrAN6BAgFEAw&biw=1200&bih=698
Note that the search results return
https://neighbor.report/d/
No comments:
Post a Comment