http://www.pipelinepub.com/news/new-id-verification-solution-uses-real-time-mobile-data-to-ok-contact-center-calls
Yes, call centers must protect themselves from incoming calls intent on fraudulently gaining customer information that is low hanging fruit.
Yes, I want the same real time protection from call centers calling me like I was a low hanging fruit to bite on their free vacations and vehicle maintenance insurance, etc.
Perhaps it should be a government mandate to provide this as a consumer protection.
Idology offers a one way fraud detection system: Caller to Call Center Receiver. Why not offer a detection protection system from Call Center to Call Receiver. The government attempted to do that with a "Do Not Call" Doesn't work for me. Nor anyone else.
https://www.idology.com
https://www.idology.com/id-verification/id-verification/
https://www.idology.com/digital-authentication/
https://www.idology.com/resources/white-papers
I want this on my cell phone and will pay Verizon an extra amount amount, 5 bucks or more to have it. I would pay more than that to have it for those dear to me who are the low hanging fruit for fraudulent calls.
Are you listening Idology? Can you hear me now? Monetize the value of your product by providing it to the general public as a cell phone App via Verizon for an add on charge!
Work both sides of the street!
Saturday, July 1, 2017
5G-Enabled Vehicular Networks V2x - Iteris - Oregon ODOT
Update 27 December 2017
https://medium.com/mtracey/new-york-state-to-motorists-all-your-info-are-belong-to-us-b8224e2e22a9
License plate readers at choke points that cannot be easily avoided. In Bend there is a camera at the Portland Ave. Bridge. It is there to record "vehicle traffic counts". A bike rider was killed at the intersection of Wall St. ans Portland Ave this year. Once again ODOT, Bend said these cameras do not record or store video images. The Bend Police Dept. said the same. These cameras are claimed to only detect vehicle presence at the stop line because when there are snow conditions the in ground detectors already there do not detect vehicle presence? That is a very weak cover story demonstrating lack of credible imagination.
My grandson celebrated his 17 birthday yesterday. After the party he and his friends went camping. Nest year he will be 18 and will have graduated from High School the previous month. He will know where he is going to college but not what he will do in the future. Just like so many college bound in his cohort he is looking at liberal arts to see and figure out the path to take.
Maybe the sooner the better to get a head start!: "What is the new "Plastics"?
Iteris: https://www.iteris.com/
Iteris rep for Washington and Oregon: http://www.westernsystems-inc.com/
Western Systems Inc. Oregon office: http://listings.findthecompany.com/l/22235114/Western-Systems-Inc-in-Clackamas-ORhttp://listings.findthecompany.com/l/22235114/Western-Systems-Inc-in-Clackamas-OR
Iteris Ped Trax: https://www.iteris.com/products/pedestrian-and-cyclist/pedtrax
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20040622005256/en/Iteris-Awarded-Major-Contract-City-Houston-Vantage: "Vantage is one of the leading vehicle detection systems in the country. It is a non-intrusive video-based system used to replace in-pavement inductive loops for traffic signal control and traffic data collection applications. The Vantage systems are used to optimize the operation of traffic signals, reducing delays and congestion for the motoring public. Vantage video images can also be transmitted to remote traffic control centers for surveillance or homeland security applications."
ODOT tracking cellphone data for motorists' real-time traffic info:
Reading between the lines of the ODOT Intelligent Transportation Systems
(ITS) Operations Centers at this link:
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Maintenance/pages/ITS-Opertions.aspx it
appears that it may be the state agency directly linked to Iteris,
perhaps via an Iteris product vendor such as Western Systems Inc. The
last line of the ODOT link is the tell: "Provide operational support
to the field using intelligence gathering tools such as cameras, road
and weather information systems, traffic flow metering and other ITS
devices."
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.08628.pdf
Peter Murphy ODOT Region 4: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Regions/Pages/Region-Contacts.aspx
highway vehicle traffic control information system cell phone
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Maintenance/Pages/ITS-Operations.aspx
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-rules-intelligent-transportation-systems-advance-homeland-security-and-traveler
https://www.fastcompany.com/1678354/the-traffic-problems-that-will-disappear-when-vehicles-can-talk-to-each-other
Car to X, Vehicle to X, Bike to X:
https://www.daimler.com/innovation/digitalization/connectivity/connected-infrastructure-car-to-x.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/street-smarts/car-to-x-communication-autonomous-vehicle-technology-article-1.2856584
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-to-everything
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicular_communication_systems
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Transportation_Systems_Institute
https://blog.nxp.com/automotive/hacker-vs-auto-industry-the-autonomous-car-industry-on-tackling-security-issues
https://paultan.org/2017/06/30/motorcycle-bike-to-vehicle-b2v-comms-system-proposed-provides-collision-detection-and-warnings/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_(company)
http://movenergy.net/volkswagen-to-start-fitting-vehicles-with-pwlan-technology-as-standard-from-2019-on-for-v2x-communication/
http://www.densocorp-na.com/news/31424-2/
https://www.flogao.com.br/girresearch/blog/5727
https://www.astri.org/news/breakthrough-demonstration-of-cellular-v2x-technology-in-hong-kong/
Where to eat somebodies lunch in the food chain of V2X? Look at all the engineers that are going to build it: http://www.v2vjobs.com Software Engineers. Like the engineers that designed cars, planes and trains and their related infra structure in the Industrial Age. The Industrial Age is still with us but now managed by the Information Age. Designed by genius, operated by idiots. The middle person that promotes and markets the product of genius to those that are end users are the ones that make the big bucks.
My reply in the comments section of: http://www.ktvz.com/news/odot-tracking-driver-cellphones-data-for-real-time-traffic-info/568145151
John:
This link from 4 years ago: https://www.ncta.com/platform/broadband-internet/how-google-tracks-traffic/ explains that Google gets its traffic information from Google Map App Users. Four years down the road from the time the link was published has probably added much more to what the App does. The App "phones home" to Google the user's location. All users sees their own location moving in real time on the map. So does Google. It is an opt in or out setting by the user. The big difference in ODOT plan is that all cell phones are monitored by pinging. No opt in or out. It is painless, few will know it is happening. That is why it will happen.
This link from dated yesterday shows how far and how fast tracking traffic by cell phones phoning home has traveled down the fast lane: http://www.androidauthority.com/navigation-wars-google-maps-vs-waze-vs-apple-maps-783994/. Everybody is doing it with an App a user installs that phones home.
ODOT might use a 5G short range system to ping every passing cell phone with a 5G receiver. That receiver would have to transmit to a longer haul established cell phone system. It is not a new idea but one that was was planned 4 years ago: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-rules-intelligent-transportation-systems-advance-homeland-security-and-traveler.
This is not tin foil hat stuff. It is factual. Happening now. I am not a tech expert and wish some experts in town would chime in on this.
This is tinfoil hat: The system needs to be lab tested. What better controlled scenario testing might there be but masses of people going to a single place at a given time to discover bugs and demonstrate system capabilities? It is like masses of people entering a stadium to test facial recognition cameras going in and out to learn how many match up.
Solar eclipse?
If that wild and crazy thought is true there must be near field 5G cell pingers set up in advance on the routes to Madras. They will be visible. Range in the unlicensed spectrum is 300 ft. Probably restricted to the highway right of way. Installation on private property is not likely. Probably mounted on something high enough to be physically not accessible. A long haul connection over existing cell phone towers would obviously be required to pass on content collected be a 5G spectrum device. This might be the way it works.
If you travel to Madras in a tinfoil hat for the eclipse then look for them! Take a picture because they might not be there a week later. Or: Maybe they will be the first permanent Central Oregon installation of an expansion of the ODOT plan?
An additional comment submitted to the prior KTVZ link:
Regarding passengers with cell phones in the same car: Iteris iPeMS system has the ability to do HOV Analysis. It is a software feature, probably not an equipment feature offered at this link: https://www.Iteris.com/products/performance-analytics/ipems. Obviously easy to match multiple cell phones to the same moving/stationary vehicles to tell how many are in the vehicle. Over a time line it would reveal entry/exit times of passengers and location of entry/exit but only on a monitored stretch of roadway. Maybe important for a public conveyance independent of any HOV association. Interesting! I wonder if Iteris has thought of this as an added feature? But probably not identifiable to individual ID (unless matched to an unamed bigger collective mass data repository for data mining) of a specific cell phone. Good point on the frequency of transmitting if the signal is strong.
Iteris has a log in resource center available for public entry via signing up ID and password. "Consultant" worked for me. It has detailed information regarding their products beyond what is offered at the corporate site. https://www.iteris.com/support. Vantage Velocity (probably the ODOT purchase?) The Velocity software operates entirely on Wifi and Bluetooth detection of MAC Address.
Bend Oregon ITS Plan: http://www.bendoregon.gov/home/showdocument?id=4575 2005
https://medium.com/mtracey/new-york-state-to-motorists-all-your-info-are-belong-to-us-b8224e2e22a9
License plate readers at choke points that cannot be easily avoided. In Bend there is a camera at the Portland Ave. Bridge. It is there to record "vehicle traffic counts". A bike rider was killed at the intersection of Wall St. ans Portland Ave this year. Once again ODOT, Bend said these cameras do not record or store video images. The Bend Police Dept. said the same. These cameras are claimed to only detect vehicle presence at the stop line because when there are snow conditions the in ground detectors already there do not detect vehicle presence? That is a very weak cover story demonstrating lack of credible imagination.
My grandson celebrated his 17 birthday yesterday. After the party he and his friends went camping. Nest year he will be 18 and will have graduated from High School the previous month. He will know where he is going to college but not what he will do in the future. Just like so many college bound in his cohort he is looking at liberal arts to see and figure out the path to take.
Maybe the sooner the better to get a head start!: "What is the new "Plastics"?
Iteris: https://www.iteris.com/
Iteris rep for Washington and Oregon: http://www.westernsystems-inc.com/
Western Systems Inc. Oregon office: http://listings.findthecompany.com/l/22235114/Western-Systems-Inc-in-Clackamas-ORhttp://listings.findthecompany.com/l/22235114/Western-Systems-Inc-in-Clackamas-OR
Iteris Ped Trax: https://www.iteris.com/products/pedestrian-and-cyclist/pedtrax
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20040622005256/en/Iteris-Awarded-Major-Contract-City-Houston-Vantage: "Vantage is one of the leading vehicle detection systems in the country. It is a non-intrusive video-based system used to replace in-pavement inductive loops for traffic signal control and traffic data collection applications. The Vantage systems are used to optimize the operation of traffic signals, reducing delays and congestion for the motoring public. Vantage video images can also be transmitted to remote traffic control centers for surveillance or homeland security applications."
ODOT tracking cellphone data for motorists' real-time traffic info:
http://www.ktvz.com/news/odot-tracking-driver-cellphones-data-for-real-time-traffic-info/568145151
Reading between the lines of the ODOT Intelligent Transportation Systems
(ITS) Operations Centers at this link:
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Maintenance/pages/ITS-Opertions.aspx it
appears that it may be the state agency directly linked to Iteris,
perhaps via an Iteris product vendor such as Western Systems Inc. The
last line of the ODOT link is the tell: "Provide operational support
to the field using intelligence gathering tools such as cameras, road
and weather information systems, traffic flow metering and other ITS
devices."
Comments from LTE4G demonstrate tech knowledge on this
matter as well as responses to LTE4G comments. 5G is coming along with
V2X Vehicle to InfraStucture and that raises serious serious privacy
concerns with back door entry via public safety and benefit
justification that feed information to repositories for multi purpose
data mining. Is Central Oregon such a backwater place receiving little
attention that it is the back door to a larger scheme of things?
I
would like to join anyone with the tech knowledge (there is much of it
in Bend) to see the various potential doors to be opened by this
Intelligent Transportation System and investigate it to discover what
those doors may be or are in fact already open and being exploited.
This
thing smells...funny...Pinging cell phones for proximity or
triangulation? Where can any company other than those authorized
entities in the cell phone communication business or law enforcement,
Homeland Security or the military get a device to do that? Evidently,
ODOT is added to that list?
Regional ITS Architecture City of Bend ref to Iteris pdf
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dave-hirsch-530a875 Bend Oregon Traffic Operations Engineer - Region 4 at Oregon Department of Transportationhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.08628.pdf
Peter Murphy ODOT Region 4: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Regions/Pages/Region-Contacts.aspx
highway vehicle traffic control information system cell phone
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Maintenance/Pages/ITS-Operations.aspx
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-rules-intelligent-transportation-systems-advance-homeland-security-and-traveler
https://www.fastcompany.com/1678354/the-traffic-problems-that-will-disappear-when-vehicles-can-talk-to-each-other
Car to X, Vehicle to X, Bike to X:
https://www.daimler.com/innovation/digitalization/connectivity/connected-infrastructure-car-to-x.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/street-smarts/car-to-x-communication-autonomous-vehicle-technology-article-1.2856584
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-to-everything
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicular_communication_systems
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Transportation_Systems_Institute
https://blog.nxp.com/automotive/hacker-vs-auto-industry-the-autonomous-car-industry-on-tackling-security-issues
https://paultan.org/2017/06/30/motorcycle-bike-to-vehicle-b2v-comms-system-proposed-provides-collision-detection-and-warnings/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_(company)
http://movenergy.net/volkswagen-to-start-fitting-vehicles-with-pwlan-technology-as-standard-from-2019-on-for-v2x-communication/
http://www.densocorp-na.com/news/31424-2/
https://www.flogao.com.br/girresearch/blog/5727
https://www.astri.org/news/breakthrough-demonstration-of-cellular-v2x-technology-in-hong-kong/
Where to eat somebodies lunch in the food chain of V2X? Look at all the engineers that are going to build it: http://www.v2vjobs.com Software Engineers. Like the engineers that designed cars, planes and trains and their related infra structure in the Industrial Age. The Industrial Age is still with us but now managed by the Information Age. Designed by genius, operated by idiots. The middle person that promotes and markets the product of genius to those that are end users are the ones that make the big bucks.
My reply in the comments section of: http://www.ktvz.com/news/odot-tracking-driver-cellphones-data-for-real-time-traffic-info/568145151
John:
This link from 4 years ago: https://www.ncta.com/platform/broadband-internet/how-google-tracks-traffic/ explains that Google gets its traffic information from Google Map App Users. Four years down the road from the time the link was published has probably added much more to what the App does. The App "phones home" to Google the user's location. All users sees their own location moving in real time on the map. So does Google. It is an opt in or out setting by the user. The big difference in ODOT plan is that all cell phones are monitored by pinging. No opt in or out. It is painless, few will know it is happening. That is why it will happen.
This link from dated yesterday shows how far and how fast tracking traffic by cell phones phoning home has traveled down the fast lane: http://www.androidauthority.com/navigation-wars-google-maps-vs-waze-vs-apple-maps-783994/. Everybody is doing it with an App a user installs that phones home.
ODOT might use a 5G short range system to ping every passing cell phone with a 5G receiver. That receiver would have to transmit to a longer haul established cell phone system. It is not a new idea but one that was was planned 4 years ago: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-rules-intelligent-transportation-systems-advance-homeland-security-and-traveler.
This is not tin foil hat stuff. It is factual. Happening now. I am not a tech expert and wish some experts in town would chime in on this.
This is tinfoil hat: The system needs to be lab tested. What better controlled scenario testing might there be but masses of people going to a single place at a given time to discover bugs and demonstrate system capabilities? It is like masses of people entering a stadium to test facial recognition cameras going in and out to learn how many match up.
Solar eclipse?
If that wild and crazy thought is true there must be near field 5G cell pingers set up in advance on the routes to Madras. They will be visible. Range in the unlicensed spectrum is 300 ft. Probably restricted to the highway right of way. Installation on private property is not likely. Probably mounted on something high enough to be physically not accessible. A long haul connection over existing cell phone towers would obviously be required to pass on content collected be a 5G spectrum device. This might be the way it works.
If you travel to Madras in a tinfoil hat for the eclipse then look for them! Take a picture because they might not be there a week later. Or: Maybe they will be the first permanent Central Oregon installation of an expansion of the ODOT plan?
An additional comment submitted to the prior KTVZ link:
Regarding passengers with cell phones in the same car: Iteris iPeMS system has the ability to do HOV Analysis. It is a software feature, probably not an equipment feature offered at this link: https://www.Iteris.com/products/performance-analytics/ipems. Obviously easy to match multiple cell phones to the same moving/stationary vehicles to tell how many are in the vehicle. Over a time line it would reveal entry/exit times of passengers and location of entry/exit but only on a monitored stretch of roadway. Maybe important for a public conveyance independent of any HOV association. Interesting! I wonder if Iteris has thought of this as an added feature? But probably not identifiable to individual ID (unless matched to an unamed bigger collective mass data repository for data mining) of a specific cell phone. Good point on the frequency of transmitting if the signal is strong.
Iteris has a log in resource center available for public entry via signing up ID and password. "Consultant" worked for me. It has detailed information regarding their products beyond what is offered at the corporate site. https://www.iteris.com/support. Vantage Velocity (probably the ODOT purchase?) The Velocity software operates entirely on Wifi and Bluetooth detection of MAC Address.
Bend Oregon ITS Plan: http://www.bendoregon.gov/home/showdocument?id=4575 2005
"ODOT operates and maintains all of the traffic
signals in the Bend area through agreements
with local agencies4."
Fourteen intersections in the city are now equipped with 50 license
plate readers as part of the Carlsbad Police Department’s efforts to
help reduce property thefts that have been on the rise the past two
years.
"The majority of traffic signals in the Bend Metropolitan use inductive loops for vehicle
detection. However, there are four different manufacturers of video detection equipment in use
including Peek, Traficon, Autoscope, and Iteris. The intersection
of 3rd Street/Butler Market Road uses Peek video detection. The
City of Bend has installed Autoscope video detection at 27th Street/Forum Drive and 27th Street/Bear Creek Road. ODOT has installed Iteris video detection at the Parkway/Empire off-ramp intersection. ODOT has also installed Traficon video detection equipment at the intersections of 3rd Street/Highway 20, Highway 97/Cooley Road, and Highway 97/Robal Lane."
"
of 3rd Street/Butler Market Road uses Peek video detection. The
City of Bend has installed Autoscope video detection at 27th Street/Forum Drive and 27th Street/Bear Creek Road. ODOT has installed Iteris video detection at the Parkway/Empire off-ramp intersection. ODOT has also installed Traficon video detection equipment at the intersections of 3rd Street/Highway 20, Highway 97/Cooley Road, and Highway 97/Robal Lane."
"
"ODOT currently operates a Transportation Operations
Center (TOC) in the Oregon State Department of
Transportation building. The Transportation Operation
Center in Bend serves many functions. A summary of
the primary functions performed by the operators is
provided below."
"ODOT currently operates six automatic traffic recorders (ATR), independent of traffic signals, in the Bend area to collect volume, speed and occupancy data. Four ATRs are located on Highway 97, with one located between Redmond and Bend, two located on the Bend Parkway, and one located south of Bend. One ATR is located on Century Drive between Bend and Mt. Bachelor. The sixth ATR is located on Highway 20 east of Bend.
"ODOT currently operates six automatic traffic recorders (ATR), independent of traffic signals, in the Bend area to collect volume, speed and occupancy data. Four ATRs are located on Highway 97, with one located between Redmond and Bend, two located on the Bend Parkway, and one located south of Bend. One ATR is located on Century Drive between Bend and Mt. Bachelor. The sixth ATR is located on Highway 20 east of Bend.
In addition, ODOT and the City of Bend collect vehicle volume information from system
detectors at many traffic signals in the City of Bend. To upload the count information, ODOT
uses the TransLink closed loop signal control software and must dial-in to the individual
intersections to access the count data."
Deschutes County Transportation Plan Update 2012:
https://www.deschutes.org/cd/page/transportation-planning
https://www.deschutes.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/738
/transportation_plan_table_of_contents.pdf
1https://weblink.deschutes.org/public/Browse.aspx?dbid=db&startid=6052&cr=1
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Carlsbad-License-Plate-Readers-Controversial-466647103.html
Deschutes County Transportation Plan Update 2012:
https://www.deschutes.org/cd/page/transportation-planning
https://www.deschutes.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/738
/transportation_plan_table_of_contents.pdf
1https://weblink.deschutes.org/public/Browse.aspx?dbid=db&startid=6052&cr=1
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Carlsbad-License-Plate-Readers-Controversial-466647103.html
Thursday, June 29, 2017
Minimum Two Acre Forestland - How To Make Tons Of Money On Trees in Oregon for 50 to 100 years.
This link; Oregon Department of Revenue OAR attempts to state literally that the minimum requirement to qualify as "Designated Forestland" is only 2 acres and nothing more. Once qualified by the county assessor a minimum of 2 acres or more in Eastern Oregon is assessed at a rate of $77.08 per acres regardless of where it is geographically located and is only a minimum of two acres for the length of time it takes to grow a tree from a seedling to maturity.
OAR
OAR
Monday, June 26, 2017
Investigative Journalism - Nick Turse
Nick Turse is the finest example of Investigative Journalism.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/nick-turse-special-ops-fallacy-throwing-elite-resources-winless-wars.html
He keeps hitting on our unsuccessful military operations and their lack of connection to strategic world interests of the US. In this one he portrays our Special Forces operations not as primarily serving the Military Industrial complex sales of armaments, at least directly but really serving only to foment more resistance in strategically unwinnable war level situations.
War...what is it good for.
If it is good for something it should show some results over time. There was a Hundred Year War but in this day and age they should last for a much shorter period of time to winning. The metrics all point to losing. The only winning strategy is to kill them all and let god sort them all out. Burn the village in order to save it.
All at what cost? What Price? What gain?
Elizabeth Warren is a member of the Armed Services Committee and the Sub-Committee on Strategic Forces.
What say you, Elizabeth?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/12/14/warren-gets-spot-armed-services-committee/TR4Xf6TnDn8izaFSlUDJcN/story.html
“As a member of the committee, I will focus on making sure Congress provides effective support and oversight of the armed forces, monitors threats to national security, and ensures the responsible use of military force around the globe.”
I hope so....especially the part about "responsible use".
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/nick-turse-special-ops-fallacy-throwing-elite-resources-winless-wars.html
He keeps hitting on our unsuccessful military operations and their lack of connection to strategic world interests of the US. In this one he portrays our Special Forces operations not as primarily serving the Military Industrial complex sales of armaments, at least directly but really serving only to foment more resistance in strategically unwinnable war level situations.
War...what is it good for.
If it is good for something it should show some results over time. There was a Hundred Year War but in this day and age they should last for a much shorter period of time to winning. The metrics all point to losing. The only winning strategy is to kill them all and let god sort them all out. Burn the village in order to save it.
All at what cost? What Price? What gain?
Elizabeth Warren is a member of the Armed Services Committee and the Sub-Committee on Strategic Forces.
What say you, Elizabeth?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/12/14/warren-gets-spot-armed-services-committee/TR4Xf6TnDn8izaFSlUDJcN/story.html
“As a member of the committee, I will focus on making sure Congress provides effective support and oversight of the armed forces, monitors threats to national security, and ensures the responsible use of military force around the globe.”
I hope so....especially the part about "responsible use".
Sunday, June 25, 2017
Cutting to the Chase
Free range roaming the World Wide Web this Sunday morning I found this: https://www.revealnews.org/article/feds-hunt-down-mystery-landowners-in-bid-to-build-border-wall/ that lead me down a path of thinking about land and maps related to my recent roaming of the county assessor's records that have links to satellite views of each property in the county and city as well as the ability to select overlays applied to the map. A map is a point of entry to so many things. It would be, will be so much easier for the Feds to find the information they were looking for so far back in time when that information will be linked to an online map with thousands of overlays.
My best find roaming the WWW this morning: http://boingboing.net/2017/04/19/great-video-essay-on-john-carp.html To see it, look at it this way: The guy is wandering the physical city like it was a map with an overlay of seeing conceptual things for exactly what they are on the map. https://vimeo.com/danielclarksonfisher/videos
There is nothing as absolute as the land. Mount Everest may have risen a few feet. It is going to be re-measured. I look at the county tax map and every square inch of the county is mapped to a tax liability. In some cases, no tax liability. Absolute mapping of the geographical area assures that nothing escapes the eye of the county assessor dividing up the entire county into tax lots owned by somebody, some entity with an address to which tax bills or may not be sent.
Some property owner addresses only link to lawyers representing the true owners. The lawyers or other non-owner intermediaries entities as well as the true owners holding legal title to the land asset value know who really is the beneficial owner of the land. If and when the land is sold then somebody, somewhere, knows their bank account just increased.
Nothing is as sure as death and taxes and money in the bank.
Maps are wonderful things. They are conceptual abstraction representations of the real world. In the Information Age we now have a direct link from that abstraction to the real world. Perhaps nothing is more abstract than the concept of money. Maybe politics. Certainly religion...to some. In the case of money and land the county assessor's map brings the two together like marking two points on a piece of paper then folding it to bring the two point points together to illustrate the conceptual impossibility of time travel that defies the linearity of time. It is the ultimate example of cutting to the chase.
Cutting to the chase has always been my obstacle to getting where I want to go. The prerequisite is a ponderous construction of setting up the situation as if it was a movie car chase production taking days if not weeks to set up to ultimately present in a few minutes.
Cutting to the chase is the light at the end of the tunnel...the point where everything emerges into the light of day. The joy in the ponderous journey to get there, that final summation is like a lawyer setting up a court case and finally winning bases on the tedious progression of presenting the evidence for a final connection to judgement.
Some take joy in crossing the finish line. Others take perhaps a greater joy in the journey to get there that enhances the joy of finish. That explains my only two of my accomplishments. Being a navy officer and a Ironman triathlete a son, brother, husband, whoever I was in different roles. Each having a final connection to documenting a moment in time connecting two points on a piece of paper folded in an instant to bring the beginning and end together.
It is the story of something that is simultaneously absolutely real as well as absolutely conceptual coming together at the end....at least for those that believe it is the end and not the start of another dimension beyond the linearity of time where the two points touch for eternity. One thing we can all agree on is that it is the end of one state of being and the beginning of another.
How did I get so far away from the starting point of this blog entry?
I like the setup necessary to cut to the chase.
Back to the set up. I'll cut to the chase after that is done.
The set up is to set the stage. Nothing sets the stage like the real world and a representation of the real world as a stage to play on...Where have I heard something like this before...something about actors. We are becoming actors in our own virtual worlds. They are only conceptual extensions of our real world made possible by Information Age technology.
Back to mapping the earth. A big job. We can see the progression of doing the job from a flat earth to a round one and then presenting it on parchment, then paper and then in binary digits. Each level over time becoming a more accurate representation relating to more abstract human concepts.
Data Mining and Analysis in ARC GIS Online
http://www.josephkerski.com/
My best find roaming the WWW this morning: http://boingboing.net/2017/04/19/great-video-essay-on-john-carp.html To see it, look at it this way: The guy is wandering the physical city like it was a map with an overlay of seeing conceptual things for exactly what they are on the map. https://vimeo.com/danielclarksonfisher/videos
There is nothing as absolute as the land. Mount Everest may have risen a few feet. It is going to be re-measured. I look at the county tax map and every square inch of the county is mapped to a tax liability. In some cases, no tax liability. Absolute mapping of the geographical area assures that nothing escapes the eye of the county assessor dividing up the entire county into tax lots owned by somebody, some entity with an address to which tax bills or may not be sent.
Some property owner addresses only link to lawyers representing the true owners. The lawyers or other non-owner intermediaries entities as well as the true owners holding legal title to the land asset value know who really is the beneficial owner of the land. If and when the land is sold then somebody, somewhere, knows their bank account just increased.
Nothing is as sure as death and taxes and money in the bank.
Maps are wonderful things. They are conceptual abstraction representations of the real world. In the Information Age we now have a direct link from that abstraction to the real world. Perhaps nothing is more abstract than the concept of money. Maybe politics. Certainly religion...to some. In the case of money and land the county assessor's map brings the two together like marking two points on a piece of paper then folding it to bring the two point points together to illustrate the conceptual impossibility of time travel that defies the linearity of time. It is the ultimate example of cutting to the chase.
Cutting to the chase has always been my obstacle to getting where I want to go. The prerequisite is a ponderous construction of setting up the situation as if it was a movie car chase production taking days if not weeks to set up to ultimately present in a few minutes.
Cutting to the chase is the light at the end of the tunnel...the point where everything emerges into the light of day. The joy in the ponderous journey to get there, that final summation is like a lawyer setting up a court case and finally winning bases on the tedious progression of presenting the evidence for a final connection to judgement.
Some take joy in crossing the finish line. Others take perhaps a greater joy in the journey to get there that enhances the joy of finish. That explains my only two of my accomplishments. Being a navy officer and a Ironman triathlete a son, brother, husband, whoever I was in different roles. Each having a final connection to documenting a moment in time connecting two points on a piece of paper folded in an instant to bring the beginning and end together.
It is the story of something that is simultaneously absolutely real as well as absolutely conceptual coming together at the end....at least for those that believe it is the end and not the start of another dimension beyond the linearity of time where the two points touch for eternity. One thing we can all agree on is that it is the end of one state of being and the beginning of another.
How did I get so far away from the starting point of this blog entry?
I like the setup necessary to cut to the chase.
Back to the set up. I'll cut to the chase after that is done.
The set up is to set the stage. Nothing sets the stage like the real world and a representation of the real world as a stage to play on...Where have I heard something like this before...something about actors. We are becoming actors in our own virtual worlds. They are only conceptual extensions of our real world made possible by Information Age technology.
Back to mapping the earth. A big job. We can see the progression of doing the job from a flat earth to a round one and then presenting it on parchment, then paper and then in binary digits. Each level over time becoming a more accurate representation relating to more abstract human concepts.
Data Mining and Analysis in ARC GIS Online
http://www.josephkerski.com/
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
I Salute You ---- JTMcPhee
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/links-62017.html#comment-2832957
For this link and all the other valuable contributions of clear common sense and moral outrage that you have contributed to Naked Capitalism and elsewhere.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22jtmcphee%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee/23
https://www.google.com/search?q=jtmcphee+vietnam&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
Could this be JT? https://www.blogger.com/profile/06760102166083835827
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee
For this link and all the other valuable contributions of clear common sense and moral outrage that you have contributed to Naked Capitalism and elsewhere.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22jtmcphee%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee/23
https://www.google.com/search?q=jtmcphee+vietnam&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
Could this be JT? https://www.blogger.com/profile/06760102166083835827
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee
President and Vice-President
Or.....vice/versa n an alternate universe! Bernie/Elizabeth ---- Elizabeth/Bernie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czR9T4TVWng
Elizabeth, you are my hero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z7GDmCM7Uw
This is an absolutely fundamental discussion of the major issues that demand our attention today. They demand the attention of our elected officials.
It is the conflict between Republican philosophy of minimum government and maximum free private enterprise to be the governance standard for our country....
and
Democratic philosophy of governance for the benefit of general welfare of all our citizens.
The few Rich and powerful vs The People.
Political Revolution!
I am so proud of my Senator from Oregon: Jeff Merkley.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOXD0-EqYtc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czR9T4TVWng
Elizabeth, you are my hero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z7GDmCM7Uw
This is an absolutely fundamental discussion of the major issues that demand our attention today. They demand the attention of our elected officials.
It is the conflict between Republican philosophy of minimum government and maximum free private enterprise to be the governance standard for our country....
and
Democratic philosophy of governance for the benefit of general welfare of all our citizens.
The few Rich and powerful vs The People.
Political Revolution!
I am so proud of my Senator from Oregon: Jeff Merkley.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOXD0-EqYtc
Sunday, June 18, 2017
Frankie Boyle Please Come to America - We'll Let You In
I never know what I will find beneath the top of my laptop when I open it like a Pandora box in the morning to let my mind enter and free range roam the World Wide Web.
Priceless find! I so much enjoy our own American satirists. Frankie Boyle is as good and even maybe better because it is all delivered in the different accent from a different viewpoint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMRWUu9WvyM
It will link to more Frankie Boyle.
I spent most of this beautiful Sunday morning enjoying this and its related links.
This is part 2 to the link after the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdACEzbjG-w
He would do well on American TV!
Binge watching Frankie!
Priceless find! I so much enjoy our own American satirists. Frankie Boyle is as good and even maybe better because it is all delivered in the different accent from a different viewpoint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMRWUu9WvyM
It will link to more Frankie Boyle.
I spent most of this beautiful Sunday morning enjoying this and its related links.
This is part 2 to the link after the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdACEzbjG-w
He would do well on American TV!
Binge watching Frankie!
Monday, June 12, 2017
Passive Aggressive
The following link is an examination of the evolution of PA in the workplace from its beginning in a government study of why military personnel did not comply with authority and demonstrated it covertly because they could not openly defy it. It was this government study that evidently established the term "Passive Aggressive".
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201612/where-has-passive-aggressive-personality-disorder-gone
By the fourth edition of the manual (DSM-IV) the syndrome had been relegated to an appendix and renamed negativistic. Many of the behavioral descriptions remained the same—resistance to routine tasks; consistent complaints about being misunderstood; sullen argumentativeness; scorn of all those in authority; envy and resentment of the relatively fortunate; and perpetual and exaggerated complaints of personal misfortune.
PAPD people are very concerned about "doing their own thing." They demand the "right to be me." They have a right to do their thing in their way and no one has the right to deprive them of it. They believe at work and in private relationships that nobody has the right to own them. They like the companionship of others but need strong defenses against being ill-used. They are particularly sensitive to fairness.
Hogan and Hogan (2014) call these people Leisurely and argue that they march to the sound of their own drum; are confident about their skills and abilities; cynical about the talents and intentions of others, especially superiors; and insist on working at their own pace.
They are self-centered, they focus on their own agendas, and they deeply believe in their own superior natural talent and their right to leisure. They believe they have nothing to prove to themselves, are quite indifferent to feedback from others, and therefore become annoyed and resentful when criticized.
Me: Passive Aggressive is broadly related to expressions and patterns of behavior in relationship to authority?
This link moves PA into the domain of personal relationships beyond the workplace where workplace roles and authority are an established social structure.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mindful-anger/201609/7-steps-resolving-conflict-passive-aggressive
"Like most emotional responses, our attitudes about conflict begin in our childhood. If the conflict your partner saw at home as a kid involved open expressions of anger—and sometimes violence—your partner's experience has taught them that conflict means someone will get hurt. If, instead of outward expressions of uncontrolled anger, your partner's family did the opposite and avoided conflict at all costs, your partner likely never learned how to fight fair—meaning, they never learned that conflicts can be productive tools."
Me: We grew up in two very different families.
More from the same link:
"Healthy conflict doesn't only resolve a dispute, but it can also build understanding and compassion in relationships.
For people who rely on passive-aggressive behavior to get their needs met, their biggest fear is that any overt disagreement will lead to the end of a relationship. Your partner is likely anxious and doesn't want to tell you directly how they feel because of fear about how you may react. Your partner is scared that you will abandon or divorce them if they assertively express their needs and desires."
Finally from the same link:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201612/where-has-passive-aggressive-personality-disorder-gone
By the fourth edition of the manual (DSM-IV) the syndrome had been relegated to an appendix and renamed negativistic. Many of the behavioral descriptions remained the same—resistance to routine tasks; consistent complaints about being misunderstood; sullen argumentativeness; scorn of all those in authority; envy and resentment of the relatively fortunate; and perpetual and exaggerated complaints of personal misfortune.
PAPD people are very concerned about "doing their own thing." They demand the "right to be me." They have a right to do their thing in their way and no one has the right to deprive them of it. They believe at work and in private relationships that nobody has the right to own them. They like the companionship of others but need strong defenses against being ill-used. They are particularly sensitive to fairness.
Hogan and Hogan (2014) call these people Leisurely and argue that they march to the sound of their own drum; are confident about their skills and abilities; cynical about the talents and intentions of others, especially superiors; and insist on working at their own pace.
They are self-centered, they focus on their own agendas, and they deeply believe in their own superior natural talent and their right to leisure. They believe they have nothing to prove to themselves, are quite indifferent to feedback from others, and therefore become annoyed and resentful when criticized.
Me: Passive Aggressive is broadly related to expressions and patterns of behavior in relationship to authority?
This link moves PA into the domain of personal relationships beyond the workplace where workplace roles and authority are an established social structure.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mindful-anger/201609/7-steps-resolving-conflict-passive-aggressive
"Like most emotional responses, our attitudes about conflict begin in our childhood. If the conflict your partner saw at home as a kid involved open expressions of anger—and sometimes violence—your partner's experience has taught them that conflict means someone will get hurt. If, instead of outward expressions of uncontrolled anger, your partner's family did the opposite and avoided conflict at all costs, your partner likely never learned how to fight fair—meaning, they never learned that conflicts can be productive tools."
Me: We grew up in two very different families.
More from the same link:
"Healthy conflict doesn't only resolve a dispute, but it can also build understanding and compassion in relationships.
For people who rely on passive-aggressive behavior to get their needs met, their biggest fear is that any overt disagreement will lead to the end of a relationship. Your partner is likely anxious and doesn't want to tell you directly how they feel because of fear about how you may react. Your partner is scared that you will abandon or divorce them if they assertively express their needs and desires."
Finally from the same link:
7 Steps to Resolving Conflict With a Passive-Aggressive
There's a win-win solution out there. Here's how to find it.
Posted Sep 01, 2016
Code Publishing Company
Code Publishing Company This link is most descriptive of the company. Looks like the sales pitch.
This is the CPC website. The company is located in Seattle.
Quality Code Publishing is a competitor. It is also located in Seattle.
General Code is a competitor
Municode is a competitor
Code Publishing Company published the City of Bend Code. The Bend Code, Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
This is the CPC website. The company is located in Seattle.
Quality Code Publishing is a competitor. It is also located in Seattle.
General Code is a competitor
Municode is a competitor
Code Publishing Company published the City of Bend Code. The Bend Code, Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
Saturday, June 10, 2017
Industrial Age Governance Information System Infrastructure Update To Information Age
http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/337135-trump-promises-massive-permit-reform-in-infrastructure-bill
"Trump’s speech wraps up a weeklong infrastructure push designed to ramp up support for his effort to rebuild U.S. roads, bridges and other public works. "
Danger ahead?????
"The White House will also establish a “Council of Environmental Quality” to clarify lines of authority and streamline federal, state and local procedures."
I would applaud this........If it did not come from Trump! The permitting process is at a fork in the road. So is our entire complex system of government law, rules and regulations. So is our monetary and health care system. They are all old, complex systems that are failing under their own weight of complexity. The transformation of industrial age systems to the information age is a painful born again birthing process. To be born again the old system must die.
It is the Information Age and all Industrial Age information systems are transitioning to Information Age Structures.
It is a crises with a fork in the road. Never let a good crises go to waste.
One fork in the road says: Get rid of all the rules and regulations. Get rid of government that creates them, manages them and adjudicate them.
The other fork in the road says that the current information structure is the product of our natural intelligence for creating information structures before there were new Information Age tools and infrastructure systems to do it. Those tools simplify the management of complexity. There has been is a great amount of our best human intelligence invested in the creation of a mammoth amount of data relationship complexity on paper leading up to the Information Age.
The "throw out the rules" fork would throw out the baby with the bathwater. Much to the financial advantage of predators that would gain substantially at the public common good that governance promotes. This fork promotes the benefit of the few.
The other fork leads to an Information Age restructure of the entire complexity of public and private governance eliminating dysfunctional relationships and strengthening functional ones from the bottom up and the top down. This fork promotes the common good for the benefit of the many. It creates a system that not only works efficiently but how it works is easily understood.
Coming from Trump it is plain to see, written on the wall, that the baby will be thrown out with the bath water and the common good will continue to suffer for the benefit of the few. In the same mode in which he was elected, the general public that will suffer from this gift to the few will applaud the gift he gives to the few.
The gift of eliminating rules and regulations given to the bloated non productive financial sector benefiting the few is the same gift that Big Business in the business of producing non-financial goods and services wants. Big Business has restructured itself from top to bottom using Information Age tools efficiently integrating business practises and creating efficiencies measured in profits.
Government has restructured its entire governance information system slowly compared to the private sector and has primarily focused that restructuring using Information Age tools at the public interface level and internally at the analogous internal public servant level. It is at that internal public employee level that they are struggling under the burden of an Industrial Age information system and all of its complexities that burden efficient operation.
There is much attention being given to the dire need for physical infrastructure investment. It is easy to see and feel when a pot hole is hit. A bridge falls down. A municipal water system delivers bad water. There is an equal and even greater need to update the essence of governance infrastructure law rules and regulations Information Management System that serve the public welfare and common good as much as roads, bridges and water systems.
Vital Information System infrastructure and its need for total infrastucture replacement, revision and maintenance is not so easy to see. What can easily be seen in pounds of paper and cost per page are its failures. Simple minded solutions of throwing out the sound and valid reasons for the existence of governance law will doom us because governance that protects the public at the expense of private sector will be eliminated.
Information Age systems storms into our life quickly and with great impact when they are new technology applied to create systems and things that never existed before. The impact of Information Age technology is slower when they must contend with established well entrenched systems heavily invested in both Industrial Age management systems and/or the means of production that is the application of that system. Institutionally, Government Systems are the most well entrenched Industrial Age system that continues to operate on an unrestructured old school system.
The link at the top concludes with a statement by senators that an infrastructure update is already in progress. It is Fast 21
"And a bipartisan duo in the Senate even pointed out that there are already a number of streamlining tools available, including a federal permitting council that was included in the last highway bill, while other new streamlining provisions have yet to be enacted. There is also a permitting dashboard for federal infrastructure projects that already exists, and it's unclear how Trump's proposal would differ.
“We are concerned that your Administration is not making use of important tools Congress has given it to accomplish this goal," Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) wrote in a letter to Trump on Thursday. "It is perplexing that the Administration has not taken full advantage of the powerful tools Congress gave it in FAST-41 it to accomplish those goals."
Fast 41 was enacted into law in 2015.
Is Trump attempting to take credit for something initiated by the prior administration?
Or:
Is he proposing something new that throws the baby out with the bath water.
Is Fast 41 a fork in the road to benefit governance for the public benefit with the other fork in the road something new under the guise of reform to benefit the few at the expense of the public?
This needs some study.
The bigger issue is bringing an old school Industrial Age system of governance into the Information Age to benefit the common good of the many and protect us all from the abuse of the few.
Yes, indeed, there already exists a Federal Permitting Council established by law.
It looks to me like a band aid on the problem of governance Information Age infrastructure reform.
New Information Age technology conflicts with old Industrial Age system of law.
"Trump’s speech wraps up a weeklong infrastructure push designed to ramp up support for his effort to rebuild U.S. roads, bridges and other public works. "
Danger ahead?????
"The White House will also establish a “Council of Environmental Quality” to clarify lines of authority and streamline federal, state and local procedures."
I would applaud this........If it did not come from Trump! The permitting process is at a fork in the road. So is our entire complex system of government law, rules and regulations. So is our monetary and health care system. They are all old, complex systems that are failing under their own weight of complexity. The transformation of industrial age systems to the information age is a painful born again birthing process. To be born again the old system must die.
It is the Information Age and all Industrial Age information systems are transitioning to Information Age Structures.
It is a crises with a fork in the road. Never let a good crises go to waste.
One fork in the road says: Get rid of all the rules and regulations. Get rid of government that creates them, manages them and adjudicate them.
The other fork in the road says that the current information structure is the product of our natural intelligence for creating information structures before there were new Information Age tools and infrastructure systems to do it. Those tools simplify the management of complexity. There has been is a great amount of our best human intelligence invested in the creation of a mammoth amount of data relationship complexity on paper leading up to the Information Age.
The "throw out the rules" fork would throw out the baby with the bathwater. Much to the financial advantage of predators that would gain substantially at the public common good that governance promotes. This fork promotes the benefit of the few.
The other fork leads to an Information Age restructure of the entire complexity of public and private governance eliminating dysfunctional relationships and strengthening functional ones from the bottom up and the top down. This fork promotes the common good for the benefit of the many. It creates a system that not only works efficiently but how it works is easily understood.
Coming from Trump it is plain to see, written on the wall, that the baby will be thrown out with the bath water and the common good will continue to suffer for the benefit of the few. In the same mode in which he was elected, the general public that will suffer from this gift to the few will applaud the gift he gives to the few.
The gift of eliminating rules and regulations given to the bloated non productive financial sector benefiting the few is the same gift that Big Business in the business of producing non-financial goods and services wants. Big Business has restructured itself from top to bottom using Information Age tools efficiently integrating business practises and creating efficiencies measured in profits.
Government has restructured its entire governance information system slowly compared to the private sector and has primarily focused that restructuring using Information Age tools at the public interface level and internally at the analogous internal public servant level. It is at that internal public employee level that they are struggling under the burden of an Industrial Age information system and all of its complexities that burden efficient operation.
There is much attention being given to the dire need for physical infrastructure investment. It is easy to see and feel when a pot hole is hit. A bridge falls down. A municipal water system delivers bad water. There is an equal and even greater need to update the essence of governance infrastructure law rules and regulations Information Management System that serve the public welfare and common good as much as roads, bridges and water systems.
Vital Information System infrastructure and its need for total infrastucture replacement, revision and maintenance is not so easy to see. What can easily be seen in pounds of paper and cost per page are its failures. Simple minded solutions of throwing out the sound and valid reasons for the existence of governance law will doom us because governance that protects the public at the expense of private sector will be eliminated.
Information Age systems storms into our life quickly and with great impact when they are new technology applied to create systems and things that never existed before. The impact of Information Age technology is slower when they must contend with established well entrenched systems heavily invested in both Industrial Age management systems and/or the means of production that is the application of that system. Institutionally, Government Systems are the most well entrenched Industrial Age system that continues to operate on an unrestructured old school system.
The link at the top concludes with a statement by senators that an infrastructure update is already in progress. It is Fast 21
"And a bipartisan duo in the Senate even pointed out that there are already a number of streamlining tools available, including a federal permitting council that was included in the last highway bill, while other new streamlining provisions have yet to be enacted. There is also a permitting dashboard for federal infrastructure projects that already exists, and it's unclear how Trump's proposal would differ.
“We are concerned that your Administration is not making use of important tools Congress has given it to accomplish this goal," Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) wrote in a letter to Trump on Thursday. "It is perplexing that the Administration has not taken full advantage of the powerful tools Congress gave it in FAST-41 it to accomplish those goals."
Fast 41 was enacted into law in 2015.
Is Trump attempting to take credit for something initiated by the prior administration?
Or:
Is he proposing something new that throws the baby out with the bath water.
Is Fast 41 a fork in the road to benefit governance for the public benefit with the other fork in the road something new under the guise of reform to benefit the few at the expense of the public?
This needs some study.
The bigger issue is bringing an old school Industrial Age system of governance into the Information Age to benefit the common good of the many and protect us all from the abuse of the few.
Yes, indeed, there already exists a Federal Permitting Council established by law.
It looks to me like a band aid on the problem of governance Information Age infrastructure reform.
New Information Age technology conflicts with old Industrial Age system of law.
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
Privitizing Public Assets - Infrastucture
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/06/private-toll-operators-love-trump-infrastructure-plan/
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/trump-using-failed-australian-asset-recycling-justify-mass-privatizations.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/10/scam-alert-trumps-1tn-infrastructure-plan
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/10/flin-j10.html
Looks to me like everybody benefits from privatization except the public! But that is intent of the scheme structure. The intent is so obvious that it is written on the wall. So was the housing boom based on low interest rates and no money down that set up the situation for Big Finance to gain at the public expense as a function of the scheme that Big Finance created.
Who will defend the public from this Big Money, Big Business Private Enterprise attack on the domain of public assets, our assets, until they can swindle us out of them and make money.
Big business profits over public interest benefit.
It is the American way.
Who will fight this as a defender of the Public.
Our politicians? Why would they fight it. All we give them is the vote. They don't get money from the public, except for Bernie.
It is a war of attrition. Big Money can spend more to win than Little Money from the general public.
Special Interest lobbyists and ALEC are the agent of Big Money at Federal, State and Local levels of governance.
Where do the foot soldiers to fight for the public come from?
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/14/infr-j14.html
By
Gabriel Black
Trump’s infrastructure plan was released late last month as part of
his proposed 2018 budget. The vague proposal, which according to his
administration will be worked out in detail by the fall of this year,
will lead to the mass sell-off of public infrastructure throughout the
country while simultaneously slashing the transportation budget.
"Zinke issued his first major recommendation to
President Trump on one of the monuments last week, a reduction in the
size of the 1.35 million acre Bears Ears National Monument in Utah
created by Obama in his last days in office. [L1N1J917V]
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/trump-using-failed-australian-asset-recycling-justify-mass-privatizations.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/10/scam-alert-trumps-1tn-infrastructure-plan
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/10/flin-j10.html
Looks to me like everybody benefits from privatization except the public! But that is intent of the scheme structure. The intent is so obvious that it is written on the wall. So was the housing boom based on low interest rates and no money down that set up the situation for Big Finance to gain at the public expense as a function of the scheme that Big Finance created.
Who will defend the public from this Big Money, Big Business Private Enterprise attack on the domain of public assets, our assets, until they can swindle us out of them and make money.
Big business profits over public interest benefit.
It is the American way.
Who will fight this as a defender of the Public.
Our politicians? Why would they fight it. All we give them is the vote. They don't get money from the public, except for Bernie.
It is a war of attrition. Big Money can spend more to win than Little Money from the general public.
Special Interest lobbyists and ALEC are the agent of Big Money at Federal, State and Local levels of governance.
Where do the foot soldiers to fight for the public come from?
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/14/infr-j14.html
What is in Trump’s $200 billion infrastructure plan?
By
Gabriel Black
14 June 2017
Trump’s infrastructure plan was released late last month as part of
his proposed 2018 budget. The vague proposal, which according to his
administration will be worked out in detail by the fall of this year,
will lead to the mass sell-off of public infrastructure throughout the
country while simultaneously slashing the transportation budget.Zinke moving dozens of senior Interior officials in shake-up: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141801310 Looks to me like clearing the decks of obstructions prior to going into battle to give away public land to private enterprise. A 5th of the SES senior staff removed! It is a Government Service position. Can't replace with political appointees. These positions are subject to Civil Service hiring rules. The objectivity and fairness of implementing these rules can however be manipulated to do selective hiring or promotion of chosen toadies. Who does the hiring? Hire from the inside those that seek career enhancement at the expense of Department mission? OR: Hire from the outside those that will comply with whatever Zinke wants. I put my bets on mostly from the outside....but that is difficult to do.
Zinke looks like a good guy. Maybe he is clearing the Department of dead wood?
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN19A1KG
"Zinke issued his first major recommendation to
President Trump on one of the monuments last week, a reduction in the
size of the 1.35 million acre Bears Ears National Monument in Utah
created by Obama in his last days in office. [L1N1J917V]
Zinke told Reuters he is likely to take a
similar approach to the other monuments, including the 4,913 square
mile Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument off the
coast of Massachusetts – which is roughly three times the size of
Montana’s Glacier National Park.
It was created by Obama last September to protect whales and newly discovered coral formations.
During meetings with New England-based
marine scientists, commercial fishermen and National Parks Service
employees last week, Zinke argued that the Interior Department now makes
around $15.5 billion per year less in revenue from offshore drilling
than it did in 2008 due to Obama-era restrictions."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/interior-cuts-4000-employees_us_5949a5dee4b00cdb99cb247d?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Zinke is emerging as a foe. A proponent of privatizing. Another example of putting people in charge of a Department that are basically against what the Department does as a service to the public.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ryan-zinke-fossil-fuels_us_594befdce4b01cdedf018edd?kpb&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Friday, May 19, 2017
Privacy and the State - Aadharr
"The latest: 20 June 2017: https://thewire.in/148687/mandatory-aadhaar-bank-accounts-legality/
The central government recently announced that it shall be mandatory to link Aadhaar numbers to all non-small bank accounts, failing which, access to the bank accounts will be disabled after December 31. This requirement has been brought into the law via Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2017 which have been notified by the government under powers delegated to it by the parliament through the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)."
https://thewire.in/136521/aadhaar-omnipresent-state/
I write about matters related to technology and social issues that relate to privacy on one hand and our principle social entities on the other. Government, Big Business, our Monetary system.
This is an excellent presentation of the issue of personal privacy, people's privacy, vs the institutional entity encroachment on that private privacy for reasons justified by its rights related not to individual people but the nature of rights of individuals being assumed into the body of the greater social institution. Whichever that institution might be.
There is much food for intelligent examination in the link.
Under laying this matter is perhaps like a shifting of the "Burden of Proof". Which side has the preponderance of responsibility to prove its case?
The individual?
The institutional entity?
As the institutional entity assumes more of the identity of the individual and associated rights exclusive to an individual person a shift point in the big picture that determines which has by default the greater power in the framework of society between individual rights and freedom and institution rights and freedom is approached.
The default position of this situation today?
Individual rights that shall not be infringed gives power to the people.
The more our institutions have the standing of individual people they assume the associated rights of people that shall not be infringed upon until.....as a progression of change over time....the balance of the "Biggest Scale" weighing the burden of proof shifts to the Institutional Entity vs The Individual Person.
The driver of that shift is technology of institutional entities that is increasingly gathering information directly related to the individual and the power that that information has to serve the agenda of the institution over that individual that is used to serve itself an its interests as an social entity like a person.
https://thewire.in/131698/before-aadhaar-pan-card-verdict-debate-over-bodily-autonomy-and-living-a-dignified-life/
https://thewire.in/84925/aadhaar-privacy-security-legal-framework/
https://thewire.in/136102/coercion-aadhaar-project-ushar/
That is all taking place in India where maybe the individual never even had the supremacy of freedom and rights over its governance system and protection of that system from other social institutional entities. Past example: British Empire.
In the USA our big entities are gathering information about individuals that give them greater power contributing to their standing as corporate entities with quasi rights of a person citizen.
http://gizmodo.com/uber-doesn-t-want-you-to-see-this-document-about-its-va-1795151637
Maybe the one thing that makes a corporate social entity, private or public, more like a person is fundamentally what it "knows". What it knows leads to self awareness. Self awareness is something that is a defining attribute of a human being.
The central government recently announced that it shall be mandatory to link Aadhaar numbers to all non-small bank accounts, failing which, access to the bank accounts will be disabled after December 31. This requirement has been brought into the law via Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2017 which have been notified by the government under powers delegated to it by the parliament through the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)."
https://thewire.in/136521/aadhaar-omnipresent-state/
I write about matters related to technology and social issues that relate to privacy on one hand and our principle social entities on the other. Government, Big Business, our Monetary system.
This is an excellent presentation of the issue of personal privacy, people's privacy, vs the institutional entity encroachment on that private privacy for reasons justified by its rights related not to individual people but the nature of rights of individuals being assumed into the body of the greater social institution. Whichever that institution might be.
There is much food for intelligent examination in the link.
Under laying this matter is perhaps like a shifting of the "Burden of Proof". Which side has the preponderance of responsibility to prove its case?
The individual?
The institutional entity?
As the institutional entity assumes more of the identity of the individual and associated rights exclusive to an individual person a shift point in the big picture that determines which has by default the greater power in the framework of society between individual rights and freedom and institution rights and freedom is approached.
The default position of this situation today?
Individual rights that shall not be infringed gives power to the people.
The more our institutions have the standing of individual people they assume the associated rights of people that shall not be infringed upon until.....as a progression of change over time....the balance of the "Biggest Scale" weighing the burden of proof shifts to the Institutional Entity vs The Individual Person.
The driver of that shift is technology of institutional entities that is increasingly gathering information directly related to the individual and the power that that information has to serve the agenda of the institution over that individual that is used to serve itself an its interests as an social entity like a person.
https://thewire.in/131698/before-aadhaar-pan-card-verdict-debate-over-bodily-autonomy-and-living-a-dignified-life/
https://thewire.in/84925/aadhaar-privacy-security-legal-framework/
https://thewire.in/136102/coercion-aadhaar-project-ushar/
That is all taking place in India where maybe the individual never even had the supremacy of freedom and rights over its governance system and protection of that system from other social institutional entities. Past example: British Empire.
In the USA our big entities are gathering information about individuals that give them greater power contributing to their standing as corporate entities with quasi rights of a person citizen.
http://gizmodo.com/uber-doesn-t-want-you-to-see-this-document-about-its-va-1795151637
Maybe the one thing that makes a corporate social entity, private or public, more like a person is fundamentally what it "knows". What it knows leads to self awareness. Self awareness is something that is a defining attribute of a human being.
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
Check ID At The Door For Town Hall Meeting -- Members Only! BlockChain Governance Application
Pathetic:
http://crooksandliars.com/2017/05/gop-rep-walks-out-interview
Exclude outside agitators!
Should a Town Hall meeting be only for qualified electors? Qualifications to attend a "public meeting" of an elected official?
I think that I may request and be given an opportunity to meet with and elected congress critter of my representing me and my voting district voting district. A right? I think so. If public meetings with elected officials are restricted to only qualified electors then........they play to the home team. They are the only ones the critter represents.
The link was a press conference. Critical questions were asked and not answered.
If the general public of non-qualified voting district electors are to be excluded from a Town Hall meeting then it should be made state law.
Congressman Rod Blum, represents Iowa's First District in the US House of Representatives.
There seems to be a logic problem here. Rod Blum is responsible for voting on all federal legislation but is held accountable only to his electoral constituents.....and.....fortunately our free press.
As a matter of responsibility for voting on all congressional legislation is not the general public that is not in his electing district rightfully entitled to attend a Town Hall meeting?
There was a pertinent question asked: Would you accept political donations from anyone outside your district?
A follow up question that might have been asked if he had not walked out: What responsibility and accountability does he have to financial donors outside his district? Why would he accept donations from them if he is neither responsible nor accountable to them?
Special Interest. Money talks. Money votes. Money from anywhere (except foreign, unless well laundered and secret0 can talk anywhere on any issue without regard to that money coming only from constituents in an electoral district.
If only qualified voters of a district can attend a Town Hall
then.........
Only qualified voters may donate to to candidates for the elected position?
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22town+hall%22+constituents+only&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
What about this:
Using the public auction model only identified district constituents many be given cards certifying their inclusion in an electoral district and thereby the right to ask questions. They also have the right to give their certifying card to anyone not in the electing district they choose to ask a question on their behalf.
This would give new meaning to political representation. A voters choice of anyone in or out of the electoral district to represent them to their representative. This right would be a one to one, one to many or many to many entity relationship.
In other words anyone regardless of their district voting status holding an "elector card" or more than one "elector card" may ask a question at a Town Hall meeting. That makes them representatives to the representative.
Since I like Blockchain concepts to audit the truth of anything then perhaps there is an application in this case that any qualified district voter may grant/give with Blockchain control the right of anyone to represent their views at any Town Hall meeting?
The district voter would monitor through the public Blockchain record any and all questions and comments made at a matter of public Town Hall record by whomever they conveyed authority in the Blockchain to speak on their behalf. Anything said on their behalf could be invalidated by the granter of the authority as a false chain.
Excellent idea: https://www.fastcompany.com/3063379/can-direct-democracy-be-revived-through-new-voting-apps
Free speech is public speech!......? Who or on behalf of whom is the right of free speech being exercised?
Viewing governance from a contractual model with performance specifications in a Blockchain system is a new way of looking at the problem domain. A contract of sorts is made between an electorate and an elected official. It is not only the actual voting ballot that makes the contract but money as an instrument of free speech as well. Political fact.
http://crooksandliars.com/2017/05/gop-rep-walks-out-interview
Exclude outside agitators!
Should a Town Hall meeting be only for qualified electors? Qualifications to attend a "public meeting" of an elected official?
I think that I may request and be given an opportunity to meet with and elected congress critter of my representing me and my voting district voting district. A right? I think so. If public meetings with elected officials are restricted to only qualified electors then........they play to the home team. They are the only ones the critter represents.
The link was a press conference. Critical questions were asked and not answered.
If the general public of non-qualified voting district electors are to be excluded from a Town Hall meeting then it should be made state law.
Congressman Rod Blum, represents Iowa's First District in the US House of Representatives.
There seems to be a logic problem here. Rod Blum is responsible for voting on all federal legislation but is held accountable only to his electoral constituents.....and.....fortunately our free press.
As a matter of responsibility for voting on all congressional legislation is not the general public that is not in his electing district rightfully entitled to attend a Town Hall meeting?
There was a pertinent question asked: Would you accept political donations from anyone outside your district?
A follow up question that might have been asked if he had not walked out: What responsibility and accountability does he have to financial donors outside his district? Why would he accept donations from them if he is neither responsible nor accountable to them?
Special Interest. Money talks. Money votes. Money from anywhere (except foreign, unless well laundered and secret0 can talk anywhere on any issue without regard to that money coming only from constituents in an electoral district.
If only qualified voters of a district can attend a Town Hall
then.........
Only qualified voters may donate to to candidates for the elected position?
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22town+hall%22+constituents+only&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
What about this:
Using the public auction model only identified district constituents many be given cards certifying their inclusion in an electoral district and thereby the right to ask questions. They also have the right to give their certifying card to anyone not in the electing district they choose to ask a question on their behalf.
This would give new meaning to political representation. A voters choice of anyone in or out of the electoral district to represent them to their representative. This right would be a one to one, one to many or many to many entity relationship.
In other words anyone regardless of their district voting status holding an "elector card" or more than one "elector card" may ask a question at a Town Hall meeting. That makes them representatives to the representative.
Since I like Blockchain concepts to audit the truth of anything then perhaps there is an application in this case that any qualified district voter may grant/give with Blockchain control the right of anyone to represent their views at any Town Hall meeting?
The district voter would monitor through the public Blockchain record any and all questions and comments made at a matter of public Town Hall record by whomever they conveyed authority in the Blockchain to speak on their behalf. Anything said on their behalf could be invalidated by the granter of the authority as a false chain.
Excellent idea: https://www.fastcompany.com/3063379/can-direct-democracy-be-revived-through-new-voting-apps
Free speech is public speech!......? Who or on behalf of whom is the right of free speech being exercised?
Viewing governance from a contractual model with performance specifications in a Blockchain system is a new way of looking at the problem domain. A contract of sorts is made between an electorate and an elected official. It is not only the actual voting ballot that makes the contract but money as an instrument of free speech as well. Political fact.
Saturday, April 15, 2017
Thursday, April 13, 2017
"Blockchain Cost Accounting"
After finishing my coffee this morning and having made the rounds of the usual websites for the latest on the United Airlines I turned my thoughts to matters of Blockchain.
This phrase popped into my mind from nowhere: "Blockchain Cost Accounting". It simply emerged without calling. Blockchain is applicable to so many things. As a kid we thought it was funny to take book, movie or song titles and add; "between the sheets". Blockchain between the sheets? No so funny but the point is that putting Blockchain first and then adding some word to it from the broad domain of transactions that take place over a timeline and there is a phrase concept created worth of some application thought. Especially transactions involving value measured in terms of validation of truth related to time and event and the sub-category of those transactions that are subject to measurement or association with a monetary system medium of exchange.
Blockchain Cost Accounting. Think about that. It seems like a novel idea worth some thought. Somebody quicker and smarter than me, and those do exist in great number, must have thought about this simple idea. It is at the level of 2+2 = Wadda ya get?
Google search on the phrase: "Blockchain Cost Accounting" (in quotes, cuts out the ambiguity).
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22blockchain+cost+accounting%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
No Results!
Another claim to fame and bragging rights to be the first to enter a simple meaningful phrase into the WWW that nobody has ever expressed in these exact words. Perhaps I should go on to grab another first since the root phrase does not exist and enter this into the WWW with this blog entry:
"Blockchain Cost Accounting For Dummies"
A twofer!
Without quotes there are many hits that dance around the idea of applying Blockchain to Cost Accounting.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22blockchain+cost+accounting%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial#q=blockchain+cost+accounting
Using Blockchain to do Cost Accounting. No hit however uses the term most descriptive of the concept. It is like an explorer discovering an unknown island with a palm on it and calling it "Palm Island". There are few islands remaining to be discovered or mountains remaining to be named. In this abstract Information Age there are however many new new major abstract entities to be discovered and named.
Who has bragging rights to "Blockchain"?????
But I digress from a strict line of developing my thoughts on Blockchain Cost Accounting by taking time out of the Blockchain (or going down an unproductive or non-valid Blockchain called "Basking in Self Congratualtion" by reading the simplest expression writing on the wall that defines what others are writing about but giving no specific title describing it.
Cost Accounting
Cost Accounting is linked to financial matters but is primarily a management information tool. "Costs" are attributed to real and abstract entities but there is no direct medium of exchange payment related to these cost except that ultimately they sum up in the price of whatever may be sold for payment. Cost Accounting might be considered the geniuses of a thing over time until it is offered for sale. The offering price is the total of all "Costs" (plus profit, or profit might be considered a "cost" in the sense that it is due (in theory and hope) anticipated but not yet realized. That is a stretch but another way to look at profit that traditionally is a child of the Operating Statement. Doesn't the Balance Sheet market value of goods produced and held in inventory have an anticipated Profit component when/if sold at market price? Not going down that blockchain here but worth a thought in the grander BlockChain of things that have a timeline.
For example: United Airlines. Everybody is using United Airlines as an example and a whipping boy so why not me too?
The cost of a ticket includes a number of various fees and charges added on to the basic fare that buys a seat on an airplane to go somewhere.
Or not!
Then in addition to whatever the ticket buys there are additional charges, fees, taxes, etc. added. A law was introduced to prohibit charging for the use of a restroom on a flight. Not passed but fortunately not introduced by Ryan Air. Perhaps a bidding war for use? ...Joke?
What if all those additions to the base price of the ticket were blockchained to their actual cost in a "Blockchain Cost Accounting System"? Score one more! No Google hits on that phrase in quoates!
There have been cases where something as well defined in terms of associated cost like "taxes" added to a ticket or other thing for which a charge is made and attributed to mandatory associated tax payment were not in fact actual tax payments made.
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/Ahxr/t-mobile-one-lemonade-stand
Saw this yesterday. Maybe it elicited the thought of this blog entry? Cruise lines charge "port taxes" that in the small print are not added to the cruise fare but when time comes to pay for the ticket they certainly are. It is a well known industry scam to reduce the apparent price of the cruise. It is further a scam because the cruise line can choose any amount of "port tax" without substantiation. Some cruise lines have taken advantage of this scam by offering a price that is all inclusive and asking customers to compare to other lines with hidden (suspicious) fees. The ad model used by Verizon to influence customer decisions. Airlines are no different.
This phrase popped into my mind from nowhere: "Blockchain Cost Accounting". It simply emerged without calling. Blockchain is applicable to so many things. As a kid we thought it was funny to take book, movie or song titles and add; "between the sheets". Blockchain between the sheets? No so funny but the point is that putting Blockchain first and then adding some word to it from the broad domain of transactions that take place over a timeline and there is a phrase concept created worth of some application thought. Especially transactions involving value measured in terms of validation of truth related to time and event and the sub-category of those transactions that are subject to measurement or association with a monetary system medium of exchange.
Blockchain Cost Accounting. Think about that. It seems like a novel idea worth some thought. Somebody quicker and smarter than me, and those do exist in great number, must have thought about this simple idea. It is at the level of 2+2 = Wadda ya get?
Google search on the phrase: "Blockchain Cost Accounting" (in quotes, cuts out the ambiguity).
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22blockchain+cost+accounting%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
No Results!
Another claim to fame and bragging rights to be the first to enter a simple meaningful phrase into the WWW that nobody has ever expressed in these exact words. Perhaps I should go on to grab another first since the root phrase does not exist and enter this into the WWW with this blog entry:
"Blockchain Cost Accounting For Dummies"
A twofer!
Without quotes there are many hits that dance around the idea of applying Blockchain to Cost Accounting.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22blockchain+cost+accounting%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial#q=blockchain+cost+accounting
Using Blockchain to do Cost Accounting. No hit however uses the term most descriptive of the concept. It is like an explorer discovering an unknown island with a palm on it and calling it "Palm Island". There are few islands remaining to be discovered or mountains remaining to be named. In this abstract Information Age there are however many new new major abstract entities to be discovered and named.
Who has bragging rights to "Blockchain"?????
But I digress from a strict line of developing my thoughts on Blockchain Cost Accounting by taking time out of the Blockchain (or going down an unproductive or non-valid Blockchain called "Basking in Self Congratualtion" by reading the simplest expression writing on the wall that defines what others are writing about but giving no specific title describing it.
Cost Accounting
Cost Accounting is linked to financial matters but is primarily a management information tool. "Costs" are attributed to real and abstract entities but there is no direct medium of exchange payment related to these cost except that ultimately they sum up in the price of whatever may be sold for payment. Cost Accounting might be considered the geniuses of a thing over time until it is offered for sale. The offering price is the total of all "Costs" (plus profit, or profit might be considered a "cost" in the sense that it is due (in theory and hope) anticipated but not yet realized. That is a stretch but another way to look at profit that traditionally is a child of the Operating Statement. Doesn't the Balance Sheet market value of goods produced and held in inventory have an anticipated Profit component when/if sold at market price? Not going down that blockchain here but worth a thought in the grander BlockChain of things that have a timeline.
For example: United Airlines. Everybody is using United Airlines as an example and a whipping boy so why not me too?
The cost of a ticket includes a number of various fees and charges added on to the basic fare that buys a seat on an airplane to go somewhere.
Or not!
Then in addition to whatever the ticket buys there are additional charges, fees, taxes, etc. added. A law was introduced to prohibit charging for the use of a restroom on a flight. Not passed but fortunately not introduced by Ryan Air. Perhaps a bidding war for use? ...Joke?
What if all those additions to the base price of the ticket were blockchained to their actual cost in a "Blockchain Cost Accounting System"? Score one more! No Google hits on that phrase in quoates!
There have been cases where something as well defined in terms of associated cost like "taxes" added to a ticket or other thing for which a charge is made and attributed to mandatory associated tax payment were not in fact actual tax payments made.
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/Ahxr/t-mobile-one-lemonade-stand
Saw this yesterday. Maybe it elicited the thought of this blog entry? Cruise lines charge "port taxes" that in the small print are not added to the cruise fare but when time comes to pay for the ticket they certainly are. It is a well known industry scam to reduce the apparent price of the cruise. It is further a scam because the cruise line can choose any amount of "port tax" without substantiation. Some cruise lines have taken advantage of this scam by offering a price that is all inclusive and asking customers to compare to other lines with hidden (suspicious) fees. The ad model used by Verizon to influence customer decisions. Airlines are no different.
Perhaps Media stories should be Blockchained back to established truth in a "Blockchain Media Reporting Accounting System"
“There is presently confusion about whether the man on the United flight
was actually David Thanh Duc Dao, quite possibly another person
entirely to David Anh Duy Dao, the man with the criminal records.”
Another case for Blockchain Cost Accounting? $100,000 sounds a bit rounded to me but this rounded number is used to attribute real fines and penalties. Basic fine plus fees, charges, add ons, extras, priority booking fee, phone call, etc?
Something to consider: As the Information age moves into IoT there will be a tremendous increase in the interaction among devices on the IoT. Each interaction is a transaction, an exchange on a time line. That is what Blockchain is all about. IBM recognizes this and the role of Watson in AI, IoT and Blockchain. It is the AI of Watson that brings it all together.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

When you're the partner of someone who behaves in a passive-aggressive way, it can feel like you're locked in an endless dance of anger and frustration. Over my 35 years as a marriage therapist, I've tried and tested many ways to resolve conflicts and have come up with 7 battle-tested steps to resolving conflicts with a passive-aggressive partner.
In order for any conflict-resolution strategy to work, you must come to it from a place of empathy for the person who is passive-aggressive, so first let's learn a bit about the trait.
Like most emotional responses, our attitudes about conflict begin in our childhood. If the conflict your partner saw at home as a kid involved open expressions of anger—and sometimes violence—your partner's experience has taught them that conflict means someone will get hurt. If, instead of outward expressions of uncontrolled anger, your partner's family did the opposite and avoided conflict at all costs, your partner likely never learned how to fight fair—meaning, they never learned that conflicts can be productive tools.
Healthy conflict doesn't only resolve a dispute, but it can also build understanding and compassion in relationships.
For people who rely on passive-aggressive behavior to get their needs met, their biggest fear is that any overt disagreement will lead to the end of a relationship. Your partner is likely anxious and doesn't want to tell you directly how they feel because of fear about how you may react. Your partner is scared that you will abandon or divorce them if they assertively express their needs and desires.
Now you know where passive-aggressiveness comes from, here are my 7 steps to resolving conflicts with a passive-aggressive partner:
1. Cool down.
If you approach your partner when you're in the throes of an angry emotional reaction, no good will come of it; your partner will just shut down. Take some time to breathe and cool down, examine your anger, and gain control of your emotion before you proceed. Seriously. Take time on this step. Things tend to go wrong when people try to resolve conflicts while they're emotionally activated.
2. Discuss.
Talk to your partner about exactly what the problem is. Both of you should define the problem from your own point of view. You want to make sure the conversation you think you're having is the conversation you're actually having. Don't try to read your partner's mind.
3. Brainstorm.
Work together to come up with ideas and options for solving your problem. Make a list of all the possible solutions—include ones you don't like, ones your partner might not like, and ones that sound crazy but could maybe, possibly work. Throw it all out there.
4. Pros and cons.
Now that you've got your list of ideas for solutions, go through your list and discuss the pros and cons of them. Talk about what you like about the ideas and what you don't like. In the discussion you might even come up with more ideas!
5. Win-win.
Choose the solution that works best for both parties. Have the intention that everyone wins, or at least no one loses. The win-win solution is the best one, but obviously that's not always realistic in every conflict.
6. Execute the solution.
Put your idea into practice and see what happens. Be sure to give it time; change isn't immediate.
7. Evaluate the solution.
Come back after you've tried out the solution for a little while (you might want to agree on a date to discuss it in advance). Did it work? What, if anything, might you do better next time?
There are also some important behavioral dos and don'ts that will help make these conflict resolution steps work (or fail to work). You may want to add to this list. Then go over it with your partner before you start discussing the issue at hand:
- Do: Focus on the present or future.
- Don't: Rehash history.
- Do: Use a respectful tone.
- Don't: Raise your voice or use insulting words or facial expressions.
- Do: Respect your partner's feelings and ideas.
- Don't: Criticize, attack, blame, or humiliate.
- Do: Take responsibility for your own actions.
- Don't: Tell your partner what to do.
- Do: Spend the time necessary to reach a resolution.
- Don't: Physically attack the other person or threaten violence
- Do: Focus on solving the problem.
- Don't: Focus on being right.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/26/stop-being-passive-aggressive-behavior-signs-_n_5515877.html"Part of being human is having needs. Part of the reality of being in a relationship is facing the fact that your partner also has needs, and sometimes those needs aren't in line with yours. It is unrealistic to expect to live without some discord. In a healthy relationship, conflict—when used effectively—can bring you closer together by helping you work together to increase your empathy and understanding.
- Not doing something that’s asked of him/her
Sometimes these passive-aggressive behaviors are intentional — because the passive-aggressive person wants the other person to engage in conflict first — but other times, it’s not intentional at all, says California-based therapist Andrea Brandt, Ph.D., author of 8 Keys to Eliminating Passive-Aggressiveness and Mindful Anger: The Emotional Path To Freedom. “They find people who enable them,” Brandt explains to HuffPost. They act passive-aggressively toward people who won’t call them out, she says, and who have very weak boundaries.