Blockchain Is a Trojan Horse

Blockchain is a Trojan Horse!  Blockchain equals Trojan Horse.  Blockchain = Tojan Horse

Same = Same.  Exactly Same things are exactly one in the same thing.  They are only one thing to the extent that one one selected very specific unique entity trait attribute, method and message the only "thing" that makes them different is a name.  In essence that is the only thing that makes the two things different.  A rose by any other name.....etc.

That is my way of getting to the point that this is an Analogy.

Conceptual understanding of Object Oriented structural nature of one thing transfers to understanding another thing.  Understanding the nature of the object is the path to understanding what the object does.  Designing the Object Oriented conceptual structural relationships of what an object is determines what an object does. 

This is going to get complicated but I want it to all hang together like a blockchain of thought.  Thought that is strictly from my Object Oriented Analysis and Design point of entry to the Problem Domain expressed as a Domain Model.

Blockchain is many things in its Object nature that does many things in its functional application of what it does as a function of what it is.  In the case of Blockchain as a Trojan Horse it is a delivery vehicle that delivers from the originating Subject of the relationship an unintended consequence to the receiving Object of the relationship.  It hooks the fish.  What the bait is not what the fish perceives the bait to be because its perception of the bait is driven by what the bait does for the fish, not what it is.

Bait and Switch.

Its a business model.  A political model. Hope and Change.  Hope is a thing.  The bait.  Change is an action.  The uncompleted phrase that begs an object in the Subject/Verb/Object structure of natural language is completed by the recipient filling in the unspoken Object of the Subject: "Hope".  What that might be in reality as a function of the creator of the unfinished phrase might not be what the receiver believed to be the thing they thought.  They essentially deceived them self by clever design of the creator of the statement that was not even a proper sentence.

How clever was the design of a statement like "Hope and Change"?  It is not a structural sentence.  It is a slogan composed to two noun joined by "and" that communicates to the recipient of the slogan that "Change" is a verb action, not a noun thing result.  Change has no real noun meaning.  What "Change"?  The recipient fills in the blank of what they hear as a verb with what they think will be the function of Change.

"Hope and Change" is the "Bread and Butter" of expert conceptual manipulators employing the the functional oriented programming of Natural Language for Object Oriented control of the Problem Domain.  Most people focus primarily on the action first and foremost to derive meaning not the objects related by the action.  Give them only the conceptual objects and their mind will fill in the action that they believe joins the objects they are presented with.  The action that they choose is their choice that can be subtly manipulated by the framing of the objects.  Then "let" them freely make up their own minds of what the meaning of a two things joined by an action verb is.  That meaning is what the functional sentence or unfinished slogan does.

Try this slogan generator.

Or this one.

It will work on people with dominant action oriented thinking approaches to extracting meaning based on their focus on a verb.  They will find some higher degree of abstract meaning in the slogans than people with dominant object oriented thinking approaches to extracting meaning that will find a low degree of meaning in the slogans.  They will get the joke of ambiguity meaning based on the nouns used.  Functional oriented thinkers will not get it as quickly, or at all.

There are thinkers and there are doers.  Thinkers think about creating structures of real or conceptually abstract things and their relationships that get doers to do something the thinkers want done.  There are more doers in than thinkers in the world.  Functional Doers look at Object Thinkers and wonder what they did to get all the money they have.  Functional doers don't have the dominant way of thinking it takes to see the answer to see the difference is all in the primary approach of controlling objects to get things done as a function of object management being more effective than controlling actions to get things done.

It is the difference between managers and supervisors of  workers doing the action work.  Managers manage objects.  Supervisors manage the worker functions of the manager's object design.  Workers  function in the application of the object model to produce.

When the Object Model operating system is so inefficiently constructed that it no longer produces beneficial results a better one, devised by higher order Object Oriented system design creators comes along with a better mouse trap.

BlockChain is that object model.  An interesting one.  BlockChain is transaction oriented.  It is all about validating a chain of transactions.  It would seem to a perfect functional transaction oriented control design.  It would seem to be to the functional oriented thinker.  They, the function oriented thinkers among management,  would see it that way.  The function oriented managers that control by the function nature of the balance sheet to invoke operating system control.

It sets up a situation for elegant design to have the cat skin itself by applying its own self skinning tool of functional system orientation.

It is a complicated sting.  Like the movie "The Sting"
At what point any viewer saw the sting coming, or got it at the end, or walked out wondering what the sting was even after revealing it in plain sight probably has a high correlation to Object vs Function orientation.

Putting the Sting on an entity that believes it is a master of the Sting is an elegant thing that approaches getting the cat to skin itself.

That is what BlockChain will do as a Trojan Horse.  Bankers thing they own the Sting in the way they have structured the banking operating system Object Model.  That Object Model gets the user to focus on the function of the application programs hiding the Object Model in the background.  BlockChain is a higher order abstraction of the legacy banking system Object Model that will subvert the legacy banking system.

Exactly how that is accomplished is a beautiful thing.  Bankers themselves that created the legacy system Object Oriented design have become so focused on what that system function does....make tons of money for them....that they have set themselves up for a Sting by more Object Oriented schemers that will take advantage of the Mark's focus on the action to win.  The same strategy that bankers have always used to dominate the game!

Bankers are focusing on how Blockchain will streamline Transactions!!!

http://www.businessinsider.com/citi-blockchain-technology-could-turn-banks-to-dumb-pipes-2016-1?r=UK&IR=T

The Trojan Horse is rolling toward the Bank and the Bank is opening up the Bank Vault.  The Bank Vault used to be where all the cash was stored.  Now only 3% (in the USA) of currency is in the legacy Bank Vault.  97% is now on a Secure Server Vault.  That is the open door that the Trojan Horse of BlockChain is rolling under the slogan of what BlockChain will Do for a bank, not what it Is that will stick it to the legacy less Object Oriented banking system model made more Function Oriented in nature not only by Technology but the Functional Oriented greed of the legacy system managers.

Just desserts are oh so sweet.

Roll on you elegant Trojan Horse.  Give the legacy banking system so much more than what they are expecting to more efficiently extract (theft by design, aka control fraud) money from their captured clientele.


This is how it is going to go down.  It is writ large on the wall.

Blockchain will become the accounting control method.  Accounting control is a functional oriented system.  It is based on the Function of money creation, managing money once it is created from nothing and loaned into the monetary system as debt money.  It is all so pathetically (good thing for its demise) a functional based system it will fall as its own victim of design.

Bankers rubbing their hands together in anticipation of all the money they will get from Blockchain techno finance and schemes they can cook up using it.  There is a bigger fish behind them but they are so used to dominating the domain they never had to worry about anything behind them, even government.

A joy to behold what is coming and this is the rub:

Blockchain is all about a continuation of the validity of the chain.  Debt money creation is about creating debt money over and over as it gets loaned into existence and then extinguished and all the games of leverage played with it.  It is almost as good if not better than laundering money.  Make it disappear and then make it come back all new again.

Banks will want to do the same with Blockchain transactions.  Make the validity of the transaction chain go on forever.  Traceable back to the first transaction that introduced money related to the first transaction.  The big surprise will be when the currency as well as the transaction are linked each in their own but related blockchains.

That is the essence of the monetary system I have proposed as presented from so many points of entry in this blog about what money is.

Apple Pay is a Trojan horse preview of the way the winds of change are blowing.  It is not blockchain but after it replaces credit cards then blockchain currency is a relatively small and easy step.  It only addresses credit cards which is an "outsourced" bank clearing function.....creeping up on core function.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2015/12/21/how-apples-trojan-horse-will-eat-the-credit-card-industry/
  
Why Apple Pay Isn’t a Trojan Horse Intent on Eating the Credit Card Industry: 
“Apple Pay is, however, a Trojan horse. Once Apple has established its platform, it won’t need the banks and credit cards any more. It will be able take advantage of another new technology, the blockchain, to offer an alternative payment option.” 
Then he goes on to debunk the idea because Apple is not interested in doing that?  

Ha!  Yes, absolutely!  Debunk that crazy idea that Blockchain will eat any big boy lunch. 

Slogan maker results on Blockchain!  1,076 Slogans.  Some are really good!

Try "Debt Money" in the Slogan Maker. 

Keep your eye on the slogan all you function oriented banksters.  Don't pay any attention to the man behind the curtain!