Rule the World With Algebra

Nobody understands algebra.  Really.

Just like money, algebra is all about what it does.  Algebra is a process.  It is a process applied to information.  Information is a thing that Algebra does something with to find unknown things.

Go back to my post about the Trinity.  That is the basic logic structure.  Thinking about that post I found this to add to understanding it:  "Philosophy and the Language of Dialectics and the Algebra of Dialectical Judgements"  At least until I got to the algebra.  I only got that far because it started with this:

"Natural science is, in point of fact, a dialectical science. It is a subjective image of a definite class of objects and a class of relations and processes related to the objects. The class of processes and relations should be treated as an ideal class with respect to which the class of objects is a material class. Both these classes form a material-ideal class of objects, which represents an original of the definite science. We term the original an objective science or an objective pattern of natural (subjective) science. The subjective science, as the pattern of the objective science, is built first of all on the basis of a dialectical triad: language-logic-philosophy, which in the broad sense of the word are the language of dialectics."

That is a starting point framing I can understand!


The difficulty of understanding algebra comes from the approach framing.  It is framed as a process.  Learn the process form and then apply it to things.  The things however have inherent properties in order to be the objects to which algebra can be applied.  In other words those inherent properties are the "subjective science" which is the "pattern of the objective science.  I can get that.  The abstract conceptual nature pattern of the original real thing. 

If  Thing X = Thing Y
Then the Thing X is the same as the Thing Y
X and Y are the same thing
They are one single thing
If X and Y are differentiated by appearing as two instances of the same thing they are two objects with the same properties.  Each is a singular instance of the plural.  There other thing  that can be said about any instance of a plural is that it exists in a conditional  presence/absent state.  There is an singular instance of the plural dollars in my pocket or not (pocket empty).  A buck or broke.

Logic that works for me. 

Here is a leap in logic:  A thing is present and an has a state exist by virtue of its absence (non Presence) (it Conceptually exists as not there, I just discovered zero!).  For example:  The emptiness of a bowl.  Nothing exists!  Conceptually that is possible.  In reality?  Nothing there is.... nothing there.  It takes Wikipedia more than nothing to describe nothing.  It gets to be philosophical in reality perception terms but more real in structured conceptual purity domains like match and computers.

Maybe that explains something about the nature of money and how there is a dissonance between the perception of money as an object in the real world and the nature  of money in the more a conceptually pure domain; an algebraic design world of the banking system that produces it.

We have a monetary system where even less than nothing in the pocket is possible and that exists as a variable state on the micro level (each pocket) depending on being in debt or debt free state. Less than nothing (debt) on the macro level is always absolutely offset by an equal amount on the asset side.

The concept of negative money.  Debt.  That is what the monetary system is built on.

A loan is the golden child of the debt based money system.  This is the algebra of a loan:

"The Algebra of Loans"

Keep in mind that is just the loan and how to calculate things related to it.  The loan is a process in the money system structure but the monetary system itself is structured on this process.  To accomplish this process to create money in the system as a result.

There is a higher order of algebra that would describe the entire banking system.

Where might that be found?  Not sure.  It would be complicated but algebra is a science that reduces complexity to find a value.  In our monetary system that value sums to zero.  For every money asset unit there is a money debt mirror unit.

The complexities of the process that produce that final truth are immense and extremely hard to understand.  Situations like that produce witch doctors and shamans.  Hard enough for a normal human to understand in the first place, and we don't.

That is how the bankers rule the world with debt money system algebra.

Plato's Allegory of the Cave 

Make reality hard to see.  One good way is to confine the description of reality to process, What things do.  A complex way to infer what they are.  The shadows on the wall that are functions of process.  Process is what things go into for some kind of processing and come out something else.  Otherwise they would not need processing.  What's the point other than to prove they are what they are,  which of course adds an attribute (proven) to the entity that went into the process.

It is when the reality, the truth of the thing is seen before processing manipulation that we know the true thing.  It is processing that can distort it, intentionally or not.  If the intention is to confuse users of the system then only talk in terms of process.  There are a million steps in the process.  Do not, if you intend to confuse with smoke and mirrors allow and reference to what is processed, just how it is manipulated.  And: Never start with an explanation of the properties of the significant objects that are input to the process. That focuses on the entities themselves, their nature.  If forced to start with the objects then construct the conceptual objects so as to facilitate the intent of the processes.

Confusion to Our Enemies.  Is that a tactic, strategy or a business model?

The ultimate triumph in creating a system to serve yourself and sub-optimize its true intent is to make the principal entity object upon which the monetary system is built an  object created by the function of the process.  The process of debt creation produces debt money.

An alternate monetary system would start with a concept of debt free money, defining its attributes that facilitate how it is to be used and then create processes to use it.  One of those many uses is to make loans.

Not so confusing when the problem is approached this way.  Perhaps less beneficial to the banksters but that of course is not their desire.  What we have is the system they desire.

What is wrong with that? 

Another opportunity when designing the principal object to the structure of the system based on the processing of that object is to design it in such a way to preclude its use by object design futures that lock it into only one system of processing.  In general the design process is to make the fundamental objects that the processes work on independent of the process.  Bind them tightly to the process and the whole thing becomes more proprietary.

Bankers own the money system.  It was designed that way

Algebra is foremost a process that acts on objects.  It is process driven, not object driven. 

Money is an debt object the banking system tailored to the double entry processing system by assigning it only the properties of debt/asset representation and enumeration.