A Google search on "Object Oriented Monetary System Design" reveals that
I still "own" the only two hits (actually the same single blog entry) returned on that search. Now it is
three hits. It would seem extraordinary in this information age where
the standard design methodology is Object Oriented that the phrase
"Object Oriented" cannot be found (other than mine) preceding the design
of one of our greatest systems that was designed long before computers
were created.
The more basic search on "object oriented monetary system" returns 5 hits and they are all mine.
Really basic "object oriented system" gets 228,000 hits. That is not surprising because that is the nature of current state of the art system design. Surprising the state of the art has not been applied to our monetary system. To Big to Redesign (or fail)? So was monarchy.
There are Object Oriented system designer geniuses in this world that can look at major system sectors of our our society and see them in an Object Oriented design structure. See them in that frame as they are now and therefore see all the things that fail to connect and see them in a redesign using the principals so Object Oriented design to create a more efficient, effective computer based enterprise system. They are innovative geniuses.
Why have these geniuses not looked at the current monetary system and see how dysfunctional it is and what is needed to make it work for the common good (as well as their enrichment unless they are open source heroes). Maybe Apple and Google have done that as I have suggested in prior posts in this blog. If so, they certainly would not reveal their ultimate game plan by publicizing it as an "Object Oriented Monetary System Design" Bitcoin is that but does describe its system design by the terms I have used nor presented in in OOD terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment