https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/genetics-is-giving-way-to-a-new-science-of-life/
Jonathan Latham, PhD
Absolutely Astounding! It seems to contain so many of the concepts that find their way into this free range blog that I am compelled to write to find the relationship of things and their expression in what they do that i generally call an Object Oriented approach to the Problem domain. One of the more recent concepts that I have looked at in this blog that the link expresses is that the evolution of our understanding systems is going toward the driving nature of system development not being Imperative but Constraining.
The link also makes a passing reference to Nouns and Verbs. The nature of what a Thing Is and what a Thing Does which was the beginning foundation mystery that motivated this blog to discover their relationship. Originally I was going to call this blog "Nouns and Verbs" but then I focused the application of what a thing Is and what that thing Does to Money. Money is a thing that is perceived and structured dominantly on what it Does not what it is.
The current Monetary System is fallacious because it is premised on what it does almost to the exclusion of what it is. The trick of hiding what money Is and focus on what it does is that in getting to my final analysis of what money Is I conclude that what it is.....is: A thing created at a point of time in future time and brought in the present real time by birth as debt.
This view of the current monetary system foundation being a future point in time that makes its birthing Parent "Future" an action based verb founded action thing in the future is at the binary opposite end of the spectrum analogous to natural science that is object based noun founded birth existence of an object in the past.
At some point in the link the author expresses the idea that RNA is a single thing (like I view Money) simply having two different expressions? How do I explain that????? It looks and feels correct and a solid foundation for system development thought that springs almost from philosophy?
Natural systems nature and structure in the domain of natural science is probably the best model for the creation of our human conceptual systems structures. I can see that emerging as the object oriented structure of the Information Age advancing to be recognized as a better model for social systems we created in the past structured on what they are designed to do (and then call them anything we choose them to be) rather than what they are and by virtue of what they are they work to serve us, to perpetuate itself toward improved functionality.
https://bioscienceresource.org/about-us/our-staff/
Johnathan Latham applied his thinking about the fundamental natural system and order of things in the science of genetics to the nature and order of things in a social system structure. Gosh, looks like what I did to examine the fundamental nature of the physical world system and apply it as a model to conceptual world social systems we create.
https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/why-the-food-movement-is-unstoppable/
Tinkering with Genetics to produce GMO is a problem. Perhaps a problem as I see it because there is a problem that may arise related to and originating from an even more fundamental thing in the systemic structure of genetic biology (like RNA or even something more fundamental than that) and its natural expression. Its natural expression being some sort of natural constraint on something else in the natural world.....like things called humans.
https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/growing-doubt-a-scientists-experience-of-gmos/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioscience_Resource_Project
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/35871-god-s-red-pencil-crispr-and-the-three-myths-of-precise-genome-editing
No comments:
Post a Comment