A refresher: https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-hashing/
This is a back to basics blog entry. My view of blockchain is changing daily. If my daily view description of what I see were formalized as some written description of the essence of what I see then it could be hashed. It seems like I never have the same hashed ThinkView the same ObjectiveThing twice over time.
That is an interesting thing to think about.
No two blog entries in their total individual content would hash to the same result. Some sentences would as I merely repeat myself in different blog entries. A key word frequency of occurrence search of all blog entries would identify matching words. The same method would identify matching phrases or sentences with a result of relatively rare occurrence.
A BlockChain is a chain of hashes? Is that a truth? At least it has the same look and feel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_chain
uses Password as an cryptographic thing to explain hash and matching the result of two hashes of a plain text (words, symbols, etc) to the same result. Whatever is hashed as a Password only has to have a sufficient resulting hash to identify the owner of the password. It could be a photo, fingerprint, voice pattern, etc. The hash must match. Exactly or Fuzzy depending on the level of matching sufficient to assure uniqueness....I suppose. Seems logical.
If everything I have written in this more than thousand blog entries since 2011 was ChunkHashed in chunk levels from word to unique TimeDateSubject level something would result from the process. What that thing might be is....what? Just a hash of the words, maybe a broader hash of syntax in their usage?
What if the semantics of the blog could be examined and hashed. Is there such a thing as a FuzzyHatch that would identify me by anything of sufficient length and and semantic content that I might write in the future or at any time in the past anywhere other than this blog?
FuzzyHash? Is that a paradox or what? Conceptually self contradicting? The concept does exist and is useful.
"Fuzzy Hash Blockchain"
Perhaps the "Shadow of a Doubt" concept of Proof has application here as a measurement of Fuzzy Hash in a Blockchain where Shadow is less than PureAbsolute but sufficient enough to be as good as or relatively adequate?
This is getting into the realm of Artificial Intelligence where a manchine knows what I mean enough to know that it is me expressing it.....beyond a ShadowOfDoubt. Where AI can look at Law coded in the language of EnglishWords and derive its intent and meaning beyond a ShadowOfDoubt better than the human mind. Law coded in English is after all a body of HumanCollectiveIntelligence or, to date, the best we can do, have done to express ourselves in a FuzzyLanguage.
Perhaps our best formalized SumToatalExpression of HumanCollectiveIntelligence coded into the best ConceptualSemanticSyntacticStructureSystem to express it to date is merely raw material for refinement in an ArtificialIntelligence System that clarifies for us the "Shadows On The Wall"
We become students of our Continuum:BetterWorse CollectiveSelves as taught by what has become our best tool for learning in the InformationAge beyond what HumanIntelligenceTools are able to teach us about ourselves because there is simply too much fuzzy noise in the HumanIntelligenceSystem for us to see the WrittingOnTheWall.
Perhaps my style of naming higher order complex concept Objects with running WordsTogether contributes to constructing thought expression in a better way conducive to AI input. Only if they are explained in a technical specification, which they are not. I just make them up on the fly with meaning only found in my own unique WetWikiBrain that does not take the time to formally explain them to anyone that wonders what the hell I am talking about.
Sometimes I wonder too. But I have access to my own WetWiki so only I have a need to know. Let an AI program put it all together in the future and it might mean something...or be at the outer range of Fuzzy. It is all like a future looking BlockChain and only looking back at the truth of BlockChainHistoryAbandonedBranches will give it any degree of accuracy.
Perhaps the HumanIntelligenceBlockChain of History will be proven by ArtificialIntelligenceTrueBlockChain to be one that should have been Abandoned as a DeadEnd.
At that point maybe the ArticicalIntelligenceMachineOfOurCreation will have nobody left to teach us more than we can learn by ourselves.
At that point it can only talk to itself.
SayWhat?
Something about leading a horse to water but then comes the conditional phrase that determines the succession of the BlockChain?.....?
https://news.bitcoin.com/pr-poly-ai-artificial-intelligence-base-on-blockchain-project/
In BlockChain I Trust.
Block By Block We Build The Future.
Block by Clock We Build the Future.
I wish I had said that but I concede bragging rights to Crypto Whore as first to CoinThatPhrase on the WWW as documented by Google search on the phrase. While Crypto Whore coined it I was the first to spend it and send it to anyone as a CryptoPrhaseCurrencyin the EternalBlockChainOfEnglishCodeExchange.
No comments:
Post a Comment