This link; Oregon Department of Revenue OAR attempts to state literally that the minimum requirement to qualify as "Designated Forestland" is only 2 acres and nothing more. Once qualified by the county assessor a minimum of 2 acres or more in Eastern Oregon is assessed at a rate of $77.08 per acres regardless of where it is geographically located and is only a minimum of two acres for the length of time it takes to grow a tree from a seedling to maturity.
OAR
Thursday, June 29, 2017
Monday, June 26, 2017
Investigative Journalism - Nick Turse
Nick Turse is the finest example of Investigative Journalism.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/nick-turse-special-ops-fallacy-throwing-elite-resources-winless-wars.html
He keeps hitting on our unsuccessful military operations and their lack of connection to strategic world interests of the US. In this one he portrays our Special Forces operations not as primarily serving the Military Industrial complex sales of armaments, at least directly but really serving only to foment more resistance in strategically unwinnable war level situations.
War...what is it good for.
If it is good for something it should show some results over time. There was a Hundred Year War but in this day and age they should last for a much shorter period of time to winning. The metrics all point to losing. The only winning strategy is to kill them all and let god sort them all out. Burn the village in order to save it.
All at what cost? What Price? What gain?
Elizabeth Warren is a member of the Armed Services Committee and the Sub-Committee on Strategic Forces.
What say you, Elizabeth?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/12/14/warren-gets-spot-armed-services-committee/TR4Xf6TnDn8izaFSlUDJcN/story.html
“As a member of the committee, I will focus on making sure Congress provides effective support and oversight of the armed forces, monitors threats to national security, and ensures the responsible use of military force around the globe.”
I hope so....especially the part about "responsible use".
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/nick-turse-special-ops-fallacy-throwing-elite-resources-winless-wars.html
He keeps hitting on our unsuccessful military operations and their lack of connection to strategic world interests of the US. In this one he portrays our Special Forces operations not as primarily serving the Military Industrial complex sales of armaments, at least directly but really serving only to foment more resistance in strategically unwinnable war level situations.
War...what is it good for.
If it is good for something it should show some results over time. There was a Hundred Year War but in this day and age they should last for a much shorter period of time to winning. The metrics all point to losing. The only winning strategy is to kill them all and let god sort them all out. Burn the village in order to save it.
All at what cost? What Price? What gain?
Elizabeth Warren is a member of the Armed Services Committee and the Sub-Committee on Strategic Forces.
What say you, Elizabeth?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/12/14/warren-gets-spot-armed-services-committee/TR4Xf6TnDn8izaFSlUDJcN/story.html
“As a member of the committee, I will focus on making sure Congress provides effective support and oversight of the armed forces, monitors threats to national security, and ensures the responsible use of military force around the globe.”
I hope so....especially the part about "responsible use".
Sunday, June 25, 2017
Cutting to the Chase
Free range roaming the World Wide Web this Sunday morning I found this: https://www.revealnews.org/article/feds-hunt-down-mystery-landowners-in-bid-to-build-border-wall/ that lead me down a path of thinking about land and maps related to my recent roaming of the county assessor's records that have links to satellite views of each property in the county and city as well as the ability to select overlays applied to the map. A map is a point of entry to so many things. It would be, will be so much easier for the Feds to find the information they were looking for so far back in time when that information will be linked to an online map with thousands of overlays.
My best find roaming the WWW this morning: http://boingboing.net/2017/04/19/great-video-essay-on-john-carp.html To see it, look at it this way: The guy is wandering the physical city like it was a map with an overlay of seeing conceptual things for exactly what they are on the map. https://vimeo.com/danielclarksonfisher/videos
There is nothing as absolute as the land. Mount Everest may have risen a few feet. It is going to be re-measured. I look at the county tax map and every square inch of the county is mapped to a tax liability. In some cases, no tax liability. Absolute mapping of the geographical area assures that nothing escapes the eye of the county assessor dividing up the entire county into tax lots owned by somebody, some entity with an address to which tax bills or may not be sent.
Some property owner addresses only link to lawyers representing the true owners. The lawyers or other non-owner intermediaries entities as well as the true owners holding legal title to the land asset value know who really is the beneficial owner of the land. If and when the land is sold then somebody, somewhere, knows their bank account just increased.
Nothing is as sure as death and taxes and money in the bank.
Maps are wonderful things. They are conceptual abstraction representations of the real world. In the Information Age we now have a direct link from that abstraction to the real world. Perhaps nothing is more abstract than the concept of money. Maybe politics. Certainly religion...to some. In the case of money and land the county assessor's map brings the two together like marking two points on a piece of paper then folding it to bring the two point points together to illustrate the conceptual impossibility of time travel that defies the linearity of time. It is the ultimate example of cutting to the chase.
Cutting to the chase has always been my obstacle to getting where I want to go. The prerequisite is a ponderous construction of setting up the situation as if it was a movie car chase production taking days if not weeks to set up to ultimately present in a few minutes.
Cutting to the chase is the light at the end of the tunnel...the point where everything emerges into the light of day. The joy in the ponderous journey to get there, that final summation is like a lawyer setting up a court case and finally winning bases on the tedious progression of presenting the evidence for a final connection to judgement.
Some take joy in crossing the finish line. Others take perhaps a greater joy in the journey to get there that enhances the joy of finish. That explains my only two of my accomplishments. Being a navy officer and a Ironman triathlete a son, brother, husband, whoever I was in different roles. Each having a final connection to documenting a moment in time connecting two points on a piece of paper folded in an instant to bring the beginning and end together.
It is the story of something that is simultaneously absolutely real as well as absolutely conceptual coming together at the end....at least for those that believe it is the end and not the start of another dimension beyond the linearity of time where the two points touch for eternity. One thing we can all agree on is that it is the end of one state of being and the beginning of another.
How did I get so far away from the starting point of this blog entry?
I like the setup necessary to cut to the chase.
Back to the set up. I'll cut to the chase after that is done.
The set up is to set the stage. Nothing sets the stage like the real world and a representation of the real world as a stage to play on...Where have I heard something like this before...something about actors. We are becoming actors in our own virtual worlds. They are only conceptual extensions of our real world made possible by Information Age technology.
Back to mapping the earth. A big job. We can see the progression of doing the job from a flat earth to a round one and then presenting it on parchment, then paper and then in binary digits. Each level over time becoming a more accurate representation relating to more abstract human concepts.
Data Mining and Analysis in ARC GIS Online
http://www.josephkerski.com/
My best find roaming the WWW this morning: http://boingboing.net/2017/04/19/great-video-essay-on-john-carp.html To see it, look at it this way: The guy is wandering the physical city like it was a map with an overlay of seeing conceptual things for exactly what they are on the map. https://vimeo.com/danielclarksonfisher/videos
There is nothing as absolute as the land. Mount Everest may have risen a few feet. It is going to be re-measured. I look at the county tax map and every square inch of the county is mapped to a tax liability. In some cases, no tax liability. Absolute mapping of the geographical area assures that nothing escapes the eye of the county assessor dividing up the entire county into tax lots owned by somebody, some entity with an address to which tax bills or may not be sent.
Some property owner addresses only link to lawyers representing the true owners. The lawyers or other non-owner intermediaries entities as well as the true owners holding legal title to the land asset value know who really is the beneficial owner of the land. If and when the land is sold then somebody, somewhere, knows their bank account just increased.
Nothing is as sure as death and taxes and money in the bank.
Maps are wonderful things. They are conceptual abstraction representations of the real world. In the Information Age we now have a direct link from that abstraction to the real world. Perhaps nothing is more abstract than the concept of money. Maybe politics. Certainly religion...to some. In the case of money and land the county assessor's map brings the two together like marking two points on a piece of paper then folding it to bring the two point points together to illustrate the conceptual impossibility of time travel that defies the linearity of time. It is the ultimate example of cutting to the chase.
Cutting to the chase has always been my obstacle to getting where I want to go. The prerequisite is a ponderous construction of setting up the situation as if it was a movie car chase production taking days if not weeks to set up to ultimately present in a few minutes.
Cutting to the chase is the light at the end of the tunnel...the point where everything emerges into the light of day. The joy in the ponderous journey to get there, that final summation is like a lawyer setting up a court case and finally winning bases on the tedious progression of presenting the evidence for a final connection to judgement.
Some take joy in crossing the finish line. Others take perhaps a greater joy in the journey to get there that enhances the joy of finish. That explains my only two of my accomplishments. Being a navy officer and a Ironman triathlete a son, brother, husband, whoever I was in different roles. Each having a final connection to documenting a moment in time connecting two points on a piece of paper folded in an instant to bring the beginning and end together.
It is the story of something that is simultaneously absolutely real as well as absolutely conceptual coming together at the end....at least for those that believe it is the end and not the start of another dimension beyond the linearity of time where the two points touch for eternity. One thing we can all agree on is that it is the end of one state of being and the beginning of another.
How did I get so far away from the starting point of this blog entry?
I like the setup necessary to cut to the chase.
Back to the set up. I'll cut to the chase after that is done.
The set up is to set the stage. Nothing sets the stage like the real world and a representation of the real world as a stage to play on...Where have I heard something like this before...something about actors. We are becoming actors in our own virtual worlds. They are only conceptual extensions of our real world made possible by Information Age technology.
Back to mapping the earth. A big job. We can see the progression of doing the job from a flat earth to a round one and then presenting it on parchment, then paper and then in binary digits. Each level over time becoming a more accurate representation relating to more abstract human concepts.
Data Mining and Analysis in ARC GIS Online
http://www.josephkerski.com/
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
I Salute You ---- JTMcPhee
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/links-62017.html#comment-2832957
For this link and all the other valuable contributions of clear common sense and moral outrage that you have contributed to Naked Capitalism and elsewhere.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22jtmcphee%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee/23
https://www.google.com/search?q=jtmcphee+vietnam&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
Could this be JT? https://www.blogger.com/profile/06760102166083835827
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee
For this link and all the other valuable contributions of clear common sense and moral outrage that you have contributed to Naked Capitalism and elsewhere.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22jtmcphee%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee/23
https://www.google.com/search?q=jtmcphee+vietnam&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
Could this be JT? https://www.blogger.com/profile/06760102166083835827
https://www.juancole.com/profile/jtmcphee
President and Vice-President
Or.....vice/versa n an alternate universe! Bernie/Elizabeth ---- Elizabeth/Bernie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czR9T4TVWng
Elizabeth, you are my hero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z7GDmCM7Uw
This is an absolutely fundamental discussion of the major issues that demand our attention today. They demand the attention of our elected officials.
It is the conflict between Republican philosophy of minimum government and maximum free private enterprise to be the governance standard for our country....
and
Democratic philosophy of governance for the benefit of general welfare of all our citizens.
The few Rich and powerful vs The People.
Political Revolution!
I am so proud of my Senator from Oregon: Jeff Merkley.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOXD0-EqYtc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czR9T4TVWng
Elizabeth, you are my hero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z7GDmCM7Uw
This is an absolutely fundamental discussion of the major issues that demand our attention today. They demand the attention of our elected officials.
It is the conflict between Republican philosophy of minimum government and maximum free private enterprise to be the governance standard for our country....
and
Democratic philosophy of governance for the benefit of general welfare of all our citizens.
The few Rich and powerful vs The People.
Political Revolution!
I am so proud of my Senator from Oregon: Jeff Merkley.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOXD0-EqYtc
Sunday, June 18, 2017
Frankie Boyle Please Come to America - We'll Let You In
I never know what I will find beneath the top of my laptop when I open it like a Pandora box in the morning to let my mind enter and free range roam the World Wide Web.
Priceless find! I so much enjoy our own American satirists. Frankie Boyle is as good and even maybe better because it is all delivered in the different accent from a different viewpoint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMRWUu9WvyM
It will link to more Frankie Boyle.
I spent most of this beautiful Sunday morning enjoying this and its related links.
This is part 2 to the link after the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdACEzbjG-w
He would do well on American TV!
Binge watching Frankie!
Priceless find! I so much enjoy our own American satirists. Frankie Boyle is as good and even maybe better because it is all delivered in the different accent from a different viewpoint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMRWUu9WvyM
It will link to more Frankie Boyle.
I spent most of this beautiful Sunday morning enjoying this and its related links.
This is part 2 to the link after the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdACEzbjG-w
He would do well on American TV!
Binge watching Frankie!
Monday, June 12, 2017
Passive Aggressive
The following link is an examination of the evolution of PA in the workplace from its beginning in a government study of why military personnel did not comply with authority and demonstrated it covertly because they could not openly defy it. It was this government study that evidently established the term "Passive Aggressive".
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201612/where-has-passive-aggressive-personality-disorder-gone
By the fourth edition of the manual (DSM-IV) the syndrome had been relegated to an appendix and renamed negativistic. Many of the behavioral descriptions remained the same—resistance to routine tasks; consistent complaints about being misunderstood; sullen argumentativeness; scorn of all those in authority; envy and resentment of the relatively fortunate; and perpetual and exaggerated complaints of personal misfortune.
PAPD people are very concerned about "doing their own thing." They demand the "right to be me." They have a right to do their thing in their way and no one has the right to deprive them of it. They believe at work and in private relationships that nobody has the right to own them. They like the companionship of others but need strong defenses against being ill-used. They are particularly sensitive to fairness.
Hogan and Hogan (2014) call these people Leisurely and argue that they march to the sound of their own drum; are confident about their skills and abilities; cynical about the talents and intentions of others, especially superiors; and insist on working at their own pace.
They are self-centered, they focus on their own agendas, and they deeply believe in their own superior natural talent and their right to leisure. They believe they have nothing to prove to themselves, are quite indifferent to feedback from others, and therefore become annoyed and resentful when criticized.
Me: Passive Aggressive is broadly related to expressions and patterns of behavior in relationship to authority?
This link moves PA into the domain of personal relationships beyond the workplace where workplace roles and authority are an established social structure.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mindful-anger/201609/7-steps-resolving-conflict-passive-aggressive
"Like most emotional responses, our attitudes about conflict begin in our childhood. If the conflict your partner saw at home as a kid involved open expressions of anger—and sometimes violence—your partner's experience has taught them that conflict means someone will get hurt. If, instead of outward expressions of uncontrolled anger, your partner's family did the opposite and avoided conflict at all costs, your partner likely never learned how to fight fair—meaning, they never learned that conflicts can be productive tools."
Me: We grew up in two very different families.
More from the same link:
"Healthy conflict doesn't only resolve a dispute, but it can also build understanding and compassion in relationships.
For people who rely on passive-aggressive behavior to get their needs met, their biggest fear is that any overt disagreement will lead to the end of a relationship. Your partner is likely anxious and doesn't want to tell you directly how they feel because of fear about how you may react. Your partner is scared that you will abandon or divorce them if they assertively express their needs and desires."
Finally from the same link:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201612/where-has-passive-aggressive-personality-disorder-gone
By the fourth edition of the manual (DSM-IV) the syndrome had been relegated to an appendix and renamed negativistic. Many of the behavioral descriptions remained the same—resistance to routine tasks; consistent complaints about being misunderstood; sullen argumentativeness; scorn of all those in authority; envy and resentment of the relatively fortunate; and perpetual and exaggerated complaints of personal misfortune.
PAPD people are very concerned about "doing their own thing." They demand the "right to be me." They have a right to do their thing in their way and no one has the right to deprive them of it. They believe at work and in private relationships that nobody has the right to own them. They like the companionship of others but need strong defenses against being ill-used. They are particularly sensitive to fairness.
Hogan and Hogan (2014) call these people Leisurely and argue that they march to the sound of their own drum; are confident about their skills and abilities; cynical about the talents and intentions of others, especially superiors; and insist on working at their own pace.
They are self-centered, they focus on their own agendas, and they deeply believe in their own superior natural talent and their right to leisure. They believe they have nothing to prove to themselves, are quite indifferent to feedback from others, and therefore become annoyed and resentful when criticized.
Me: Passive Aggressive is broadly related to expressions and patterns of behavior in relationship to authority?
This link moves PA into the domain of personal relationships beyond the workplace where workplace roles and authority are an established social structure.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mindful-anger/201609/7-steps-resolving-conflict-passive-aggressive
"Like most emotional responses, our attitudes about conflict begin in our childhood. If the conflict your partner saw at home as a kid involved open expressions of anger—and sometimes violence—your partner's experience has taught them that conflict means someone will get hurt. If, instead of outward expressions of uncontrolled anger, your partner's family did the opposite and avoided conflict at all costs, your partner likely never learned how to fight fair—meaning, they never learned that conflicts can be productive tools."
Me: We grew up in two very different families.
More from the same link:
"Healthy conflict doesn't only resolve a dispute, but it can also build understanding and compassion in relationships.
For people who rely on passive-aggressive behavior to get their needs met, their biggest fear is that any overt disagreement will lead to the end of a relationship. Your partner is likely anxious and doesn't want to tell you directly how they feel because of fear about how you may react. Your partner is scared that you will abandon or divorce them if they assertively express their needs and desires."
Finally from the same link:
7 Steps to Resolving Conflict With a Passive-Aggressive
There's a win-win solution out there. Here's how to find it.
Posted Sep 01, 2016
Code Publishing Company
Code Publishing Company This link is most descriptive of the company. Looks like the sales pitch.
This is the CPC website. The company is located in Seattle.
Quality Code Publishing is a competitor. It is also located in Seattle.
General Code is a competitor
Municode is a competitor
Code Publishing Company published the City of Bend Code. The Bend Code, Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
This is the CPC website. The company is located in Seattle.
Quality Code Publishing is a competitor. It is also located in Seattle.
General Code is a competitor
Municode is a competitor
Code Publishing Company published the City of Bend Code. The Bend Code, Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
Saturday, June 10, 2017
Industrial Age Governance Information System Infrastructure Update To Information Age
http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/337135-trump-promises-massive-permit-reform-in-infrastructure-bill
"Trump’s speech wraps up a weeklong infrastructure push designed to ramp up support for his effort to rebuild U.S. roads, bridges and other public works. "
Danger ahead?????
"The White House will also establish a “Council of Environmental Quality” to clarify lines of authority and streamline federal, state and local procedures."
I would applaud this........If it did not come from Trump! The permitting process is at a fork in the road. So is our entire complex system of government law, rules and regulations. So is our monetary and health care system. They are all old, complex systems that are failing under their own weight of complexity. The transformation of industrial age systems to the information age is a painful born again birthing process. To be born again the old system must die.
It is the Information Age and all Industrial Age information systems are transitioning to Information Age Structures.
It is a crises with a fork in the road. Never let a good crises go to waste.
One fork in the road says: Get rid of all the rules and regulations. Get rid of government that creates them, manages them and adjudicate them.
The other fork in the road says that the current information structure is the product of our natural intelligence for creating information structures before there were new Information Age tools and infrastructure systems to do it. Those tools simplify the management of complexity. There has been is a great amount of our best human intelligence invested in the creation of a mammoth amount of data relationship complexity on paper leading up to the Information Age.
The "throw out the rules" fork would throw out the baby with the bathwater. Much to the financial advantage of predators that would gain substantially at the public common good that governance promotes. This fork promotes the benefit of the few.
The other fork leads to an Information Age restructure of the entire complexity of public and private governance eliminating dysfunctional relationships and strengthening functional ones from the bottom up and the top down. This fork promotes the common good for the benefit of the many. It creates a system that not only works efficiently but how it works is easily understood.
Coming from Trump it is plain to see, written on the wall, that the baby will be thrown out with the bath water and the common good will continue to suffer for the benefit of the few. In the same mode in which he was elected, the general public that will suffer from this gift to the few will applaud the gift he gives to the few.
The gift of eliminating rules and regulations given to the bloated non productive financial sector benefiting the few is the same gift that Big Business in the business of producing non-financial goods and services wants. Big Business has restructured itself from top to bottom using Information Age tools efficiently integrating business practises and creating efficiencies measured in profits.
Government has restructured its entire governance information system slowly compared to the private sector and has primarily focused that restructuring using Information Age tools at the public interface level and internally at the analogous internal public servant level. It is at that internal public employee level that they are struggling under the burden of an Industrial Age information system and all of its complexities that burden efficient operation.
There is much attention being given to the dire need for physical infrastructure investment. It is easy to see and feel when a pot hole is hit. A bridge falls down. A municipal water system delivers bad water. There is an equal and even greater need to update the essence of governance infrastructure law rules and regulations Information Management System that serve the public welfare and common good as much as roads, bridges and water systems.
Vital Information System infrastructure and its need for total infrastucture replacement, revision and maintenance is not so easy to see. What can easily be seen in pounds of paper and cost per page are its failures. Simple minded solutions of throwing out the sound and valid reasons for the existence of governance law will doom us because governance that protects the public at the expense of private sector will be eliminated.
Information Age systems storms into our life quickly and with great impact when they are new technology applied to create systems and things that never existed before. The impact of Information Age technology is slower when they must contend with established well entrenched systems heavily invested in both Industrial Age management systems and/or the means of production that is the application of that system. Institutionally, Government Systems are the most well entrenched Industrial Age system that continues to operate on an unrestructured old school system.
The link at the top concludes with a statement by senators that an infrastructure update is already in progress. It is Fast 21
"And a bipartisan duo in the Senate even pointed out that there are already a number of streamlining tools available, including a federal permitting council that was included in the last highway bill, while other new streamlining provisions have yet to be enacted. There is also a permitting dashboard for federal infrastructure projects that already exists, and it's unclear how Trump's proposal would differ.
“We are concerned that your Administration is not making use of important tools Congress has given it to accomplish this goal," Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) wrote in a letter to Trump on Thursday. "It is perplexing that the Administration has not taken full advantage of the powerful tools Congress gave it in FAST-41 it to accomplish those goals."
Fast 41 was enacted into law in 2015.
Is Trump attempting to take credit for something initiated by the prior administration?
Or:
Is he proposing something new that throws the baby out with the bath water.
Is Fast 41 a fork in the road to benefit governance for the public benefit with the other fork in the road something new under the guise of reform to benefit the few at the expense of the public?
This needs some study.
The bigger issue is bringing an old school Industrial Age system of governance into the Information Age to benefit the common good of the many and protect us all from the abuse of the few.
Yes, indeed, there already exists a Federal Permitting Council established by law.
It looks to me like a band aid on the problem of governance Information Age infrastructure reform.
New Information Age technology conflicts with old Industrial Age system of law.
"Trump’s speech wraps up a weeklong infrastructure push designed to ramp up support for his effort to rebuild U.S. roads, bridges and other public works. "
Danger ahead?????
"The White House will also establish a “Council of Environmental Quality” to clarify lines of authority and streamline federal, state and local procedures."
I would applaud this........If it did not come from Trump! The permitting process is at a fork in the road. So is our entire complex system of government law, rules and regulations. So is our monetary and health care system. They are all old, complex systems that are failing under their own weight of complexity. The transformation of industrial age systems to the information age is a painful born again birthing process. To be born again the old system must die.
It is the Information Age and all Industrial Age information systems are transitioning to Information Age Structures.
It is a crises with a fork in the road. Never let a good crises go to waste.
One fork in the road says: Get rid of all the rules and regulations. Get rid of government that creates them, manages them and adjudicate them.
The other fork in the road says that the current information structure is the product of our natural intelligence for creating information structures before there were new Information Age tools and infrastructure systems to do it. Those tools simplify the management of complexity. There has been is a great amount of our best human intelligence invested in the creation of a mammoth amount of data relationship complexity on paper leading up to the Information Age.
The "throw out the rules" fork would throw out the baby with the bathwater. Much to the financial advantage of predators that would gain substantially at the public common good that governance promotes. This fork promotes the benefit of the few.
The other fork leads to an Information Age restructure of the entire complexity of public and private governance eliminating dysfunctional relationships and strengthening functional ones from the bottom up and the top down. This fork promotes the common good for the benefit of the many. It creates a system that not only works efficiently but how it works is easily understood.
Coming from Trump it is plain to see, written on the wall, that the baby will be thrown out with the bath water and the common good will continue to suffer for the benefit of the few. In the same mode in which he was elected, the general public that will suffer from this gift to the few will applaud the gift he gives to the few.
The gift of eliminating rules and regulations given to the bloated non productive financial sector benefiting the few is the same gift that Big Business in the business of producing non-financial goods and services wants. Big Business has restructured itself from top to bottom using Information Age tools efficiently integrating business practises and creating efficiencies measured in profits.
Government has restructured its entire governance information system slowly compared to the private sector and has primarily focused that restructuring using Information Age tools at the public interface level and internally at the analogous internal public servant level. It is at that internal public employee level that they are struggling under the burden of an Industrial Age information system and all of its complexities that burden efficient operation.
There is much attention being given to the dire need for physical infrastructure investment. It is easy to see and feel when a pot hole is hit. A bridge falls down. A municipal water system delivers bad water. There is an equal and even greater need to update the essence of governance infrastructure law rules and regulations Information Management System that serve the public welfare and common good as much as roads, bridges and water systems.
Vital Information System infrastructure and its need for total infrastucture replacement, revision and maintenance is not so easy to see. What can easily be seen in pounds of paper and cost per page are its failures. Simple minded solutions of throwing out the sound and valid reasons for the existence of governance law will doom us because governance that protects the public at the expense of private sector will be eliminated.
Information Age systems storms into our life quickly and with great impact when they are new technology applied to create systems and things that never existed before. The impact of Information Age technology is slower when they must contend with established well entrenched systems heavily invested in both Industrial Age management systems and/or the means of production that is the application of that system. Institutionally, Government Systems are the most well entrenched Industrial Age system that continues to operate on an unrestructured old school system.
The link at the top concludes with a statement by senators that an infrastructure update is already in progress. It is Fast 21
"And a bipartisan duo in the Senate even pointed out that there are already a number of streamlining tools available, including a federal permitting council that was included in the last highway bill, while other new streamlining provisions have yet to be enacted. There is also a permitting dashboard for federal infrastructure projects that already exists, and it's unclear how Trump's proposal would differ.
“We are concerned that your Administration is not making use of important tools Congress has given it to accomplish this goal," Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) wrote in a letter to Trump on Thursday. "It is perplexing that the Administration has not taken full advantage of the powerful tools Congress gave it in FAST-41 it to accomplish those goals."
Fast 41 was enacted into law in 2015.
Is Trump attempting to take credit for something initiated by the prior administration?
Or:
Is he proposing something new that throws the baby out with the bath water.
Is Fast 41 a fork in the road to benefit governance for the public benefit with the other fork in the road something new under the guise of reform to benefit the few at the expense of the public?
This needs some study.
The bigger issue is bringing an old school Industrial Age system of governance into the Information Age to benefit the common good of the many and protect us all from the abuse of the few.
Yes, indeed, there already exists a Federal Permitting Council established by law.
It looks to me like a band aid on the problem of governance Information Age infrastructure reform.
New Information Age technology conflicts with old Industrial Age system of law.
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
Privitizing Public Assets - Infrastucture
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/06/private-toll-operators-love-trump-infrastructure-plan/
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/trump-using-failed-australian-asset-recycling-justify-mass-privatizations.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/10/scam-alert-trumps-1tn-infrastructure-plan
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/10/flin-j10.html
Looks to me like everybody benefits from privatization except the public! But that is intent of the scheme structure. The intent is so obvious that it is written on the wall. So was the housing boom based on low interest rates and no money down that set up the situation for Big Finance to gain at the public expense as a function of the scheme that Big Finance created.
Who will defend the public from this Big Money, Big Business Private Enterprise attack on the domain of public assets, our assets, until they can swindle us out of them and make money.
Big business profits over public interest benefit.
It is the American way.
Who will fight this as a defender of the Public.
Our politicians? Why would they fight it. All we give them is the vote. They don't get money from the public, except for Bernie.
It is a war of attrition. Big Money can spend more to win than Little Money from the general public.
Special Interest lobbyists and ALEC are the agent of Big Money at Federal, State and Local levels of governance.
Where do the foot soldiers to fight for the public come from?
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/14/infr-j14.html
By
Gabriel Black
Trump’s infrastructure plan was released late last month as part of
his proposed 2018 budget. The vague proposal, which according to his
administration will be worked out in detail by the fall of this year,
will lead to the mass sell-off of public infrastructure throughout the
country while simultaneously slashing the transportation budget.
"Zinke issued his first major recommendation to
President Trump on one of the monuments last week, a reduction in the
size of the 1.35 million acre Bears Ears National Monument in Utah
created by Obama in his last days in office. [L1N1J917V]
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/06/trump-using-failed-australian-asset-recycling-justify-mass-privatizations.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/10/scam-alert-trumps-1tn-infrastructure-plan
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/10/flin-j10.html
Looks to me like everybody benefits from privatization except the public! But that is intent of the scheme structure. The intent is so obvious that it is written on the wall. So was the housing boom based on low interest rates and no money down that set up the situation for Big Finance to gain at the public expense as a function of the scheme that Big Finance created.
Who will defend the public from this Big Money, Big Business Private Enterprise attack on the domain of public assets, our assets, until they can swindle us out of them and make money.
Big business profits over public interest benefit.
It is the American way.
Who will fight this as a defender of the Public.
Our politicians? Why would they fight it. All we give them is the vote. They don't get money from the public, except for Bernie.
It is a war of attrition. Big Money can spend more to win than Little Money from the general public.
Special Interest lobbyists and ALEC are the agent of Big Money at Federal, State and Local levels of governance.
Where do the foot soldiers to fight for the public come from?
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/06/14/infr-j14.html
When you're the partner of someone who behaves in a passive-aggressive way, it can feel like you're locked in an endless dance of anger and frustration. Over my 35 years as a marriage therapist, I've tried and tested many ways to resolve conflicts and have come up with 7 battle-tested steps to resolving conflicts with a passive-aggressive partner.
In order for any conflict-resolution strategy to work, you must come to it from a place of empathy for the person who is passive-aggressive, so first let's learn a bit about the trait.
Like most emotional responses, our attitudes about conflict begin in our childhood. If the conflict your partner saw at home as a kid involved open expressions of anger—and sometimes violence—your partner's experience has taught them that conflict means someone will get hurt. If, instead of outward expressions of uncontrolled anger, your partner's family did the opposite and avoided conflict at all costs, your partner likely never learned how to fight fair—meaning, they never learned that conflicts can be productive tools.
Healthy conflict doesn't only resolve a dispute, but it can also build understanding and compassion in relationships.
For people who rely on passive-aggressive behavior to get their needs met, their biggest fear is that any overt disagreement will lead to the end of a relationship. Your partner is likely anxious and doesn't want to tell you directly how they feel because of fear about how you may react. Your partner is scared that you will abandon or divorce them if they assertively express their needs and desires.
Now you know where passive-aggressiveness comes from, here are my 7 steps to resolving conflicts with a passive-aggressive partner:
1. Cool down.
If you approach your partner when you're in the throes of an angry emotional reaction, no good will come of it; your partner will just shut down. Take some time to breathe and cool down, examine your anger, and gain control of your emotion before you proceed. Seriously. Take time on this step. Things tend to go wrong when people try to resolve conflicts while they're emotionally activated.
2. Discuss.
Talk to your partner about exactly what the problem is. Both of you should define the problem from your own point of view. You want to make sure the conversation you think you're having is the conversation you're actually having. Don't try to read your partner's mind.
3. Brainstorm.
Work together to come up with ideas and options for solving your problem. Make a list of all the possible solutions—include ones you don't like, ones your partner might not like, and ones that sound crazy but could maybe, possibly work. Throw it all out there.
4. Pros and cons.
Now that you've got your list of ideas for solutions, go through your list and discuss the pros and cons of them. Talk about what you like about the ideas and what you don't like. In the discussion you might even come up with more ideas!
5. Win-win.
Choose the solution that works best for both parties. Have the intention that everyone wins, or at least no one loses. The win-win solution is the best one, but obviously that's not always realistic in every conflict.
6. Execute the solution.
Put your idea into practice and see what happens. Be sure to give it time; change isn't immediate.
7. Evaluate the solution.
Come back after you've tried out the solution for a little while (you might want to agree on a date to discuss it in advance). Did it work? What, if anything, might you do better next time?
There are also some important behavioral dos and don'ts that will help make these conflict resolution steps work (or fail to work). You may want to add to this list. Then go over it with your partner before you start discussing the issue at hand:
"Part of being human is having needs. Part of the reality of being in a relationship is facing the fact that your partner also has needs, and sometimes those needs aren't in line with yours. It is unrealistic to expect to live without some discord. In a healthy relationship, conflict—when used effectively—can bring you closer together by helping you work together to increase your empathy and understanding.