Looking at MLK today from a different standpoint as a result of the prior blog entry.
Was his an Imperative based approach to the problem or was it Constraint based?
Morally Imperative as the absolutely right thing to do.
Constraint based as the only the only natural best way to accomplish the freeing of constraining Imperative conceptual moral value chains that bind all of us.
An extremely complex set of constraining relationships can lead to one single simple imperative solution.
That previous statement puts a conceptual Constraint based approach in the Subject drivers seat of the relationship instead of the conceptual Imperative based approach. What becomes conceptually Imperative as a result is analogous to a Natural Physical World result of its Constraint based system of Nature.
His was the natural way of implementing the conceptual dream that he saw?
Whose way is the natural way after all?
Perhaps the human failings that he sought to correct existed because we declare conceptual imperatives in advance rather that let them find their natural course of development as the result of a constraint balanced based system.
He was non-violent.
Violence is Imperative based?
Non-violence is constraint based?
No comments:
Post a Comment