World Wide Web As An Artificial Intelligence .com Website Licensed Standards Driven Governance System

Background:  This post was originally attached to the prior post entry with the subject AiHit.  That post generated a thought tangent that I followed and it become something much different than what spawned it.  Different enough to deserve its own subject line.  Now I have to reduce it to an appropriate subject line!  Seems to be the hard part to sum it up to an intelligent subject descriptor!

Maybe I need an AI program to parse it and do that.  To tell me and you the essence of what all I wrote is related to in the short form of knowing what it is all about.  In the absence of that my intelligence and yours will have to suffice.  Like driving our own cars.  Perhaps someday AI will driver them better for us.

As I roam the web in an investigatory manner following a trail of link relationships like a detective I stumble over extremely interesting things that unexpectedly branch me to a new course, sometimes totally new, totally different  course of investigation.  Maybe I just have a short attention span in doggedly going after the original intent?  No, just a matter of finding something more juicy along the way.

Often the information that I would like to look at is behind a member/subsciber access only gate.  Not the public info that the google crawler goes to and indexes so conveniently for me to browse and connect related things that it does not.  Using my own intelligence and everything I know to link things in my mind and discover more as I beat the google path of inquiry.

Artificial Intelligence could do much of the leg work that I do in my investigative roaming of the World Wide Web.  The web crawler model has progressed from simple indexing of information on the Web to make it all searchable to making connections among related websites that are a function of narrow searches, such as an individual or business or government entity.  What I am addressing here is the AI generation of knowledge by crawling the web beyond the generation of information.  That begs a definition of the terms information and knowledge.  The day is coming when our perception of what AI generates undergoes a paradigm shift from being viewed only as machine generated information but knowledge built on that information.  I think that time is close.  Already here for those that can see it.  The NSA is at the bleeding edge of this but of course we do not know yet what it knows.  "It" not "They".  What the NSA as a non human "It" entity "Knows" as knowledge as contrasted to simple information derived from base data (data base) I believe goes far beyond the knowledge of what "they",  the collective human intelligence of the NSA knows.

At the most secret level the "They" of the NSA or any government agency operating at the beyond Top Secret level and into compartmented operations is silo information, perhaps even cover story silo information.  People working with it don't know.  It is vital that they do not.  Only the top level people have a need to know the real knowledge of mission and methods.  They, therefore are the only ones by design that would have access to the AI generated knowledge of this intelligent "It" entity of the NSA.  The most important thing its to protect "It" from leaks.

The AI non human machine based intelligent knowledge entity of the NSA that "It" knows "leaks" when it goes into the hands and wet ware minds of those few in the NSA that process and refine it into human based intelligence.  A human intelligence domain being subsumed progressively by artificial intelligence.  Use driverless cars as a model.  That is not a bad way to look at it.

Another way to look at the dominance of AI over human intelligence is the military model of "Look then Shoot' versus the model of "Shoot then Look"  The former is a situation where the shooter of a missile is a human applying human intelligence to the problem domain that results in pulling the trigger (called the pickle for missile launch) or the AI program making a decision based on knowledge derived from all the system data based information that it has to work work with.  In that case either the human "Looks" to evaluate the AI knowledge decision making effectiveness and takes the next knowledge based step or by pre-programming allows the system to do the "Look" and shoot again.

Perhaps the ultimate conclusion of the AI program doing the shooting to the exclusion of human knowledge intelligent intervention (contravention) of the artificial knowledge intelligence program algorithm is that human intelligence is only applied to damage assessment.  That too could be done by AI.  Where does that leave human intelligence in this scenario? // Multiple question marks are appropriate here............

Where does human intelligence then eventually enter the picture?  Somewhere in the PR department that translates (codes) the product of an AI intelligent system into the domain of human intelligence!

They are two different systems of Intelligence!  Which one deals better with the truth?  Which controls the other?

Back to my objective in writing this entry....see how easily I go down a branch in the road?  I always take it.

I want to see Websites on the WWW contain AI searchable knowledge to go to the next level of machine based intelligence.  Currently there is a growing degree of Knowledge existing in a corporate entity or human entity (or combination of both) website.  It has almost become a de facto "About Me" or "About US" link at the home page.  "About US" actually meaning "About Me" as a corporate non-human entity.

What I want to see in "About US" is certain mandatory information data, information, and knowledge defined by law.  Either directly stated or linked.  "About US" becomes a description of "Who" the corporate entity represented by the website is.  One of the most important elements related to  "Who" the entity is.....equals = Who are the beneficial owners.

"Beneficial Owners" is higher order information progressing toward knowledge.  It is knowledge concept that is emerging out of money laundering, tax evasion and financial manipulation.  It is a concept to control the financial and economic structure.  Logically following the opportunity to apply control to the political domain, Beneficial Owners are to a great extent the elite power base that has political influence of a Dollar Vote in relation to Beneficial Owners of a Ballot Vote.

The core concept I see is moving knowledge.....no, not moving, nothing truly moves here. .....

Side bar:  (exactly like my conceptual monetary system where digital money itself, the monetary unit of a block chain system never really moves from hand to hand, account to account......

Back to the line of thought:......moving knowledge of Beneficial Ownership  as documented by the  "Web Site" (Analogous to Account) to links defining who the beneficial "Owner" is and the Accounting entity that "Owner" is linked to for the fruits of its Beneficial Ownership.....That being "Money".

Much of that is discoverable through tedious application of human intelligence.

Make it all up front and in the website as a mater of law applicable to information about who the entity represented by the website is the Beneficial Owner.  The non human Beneficial Owner of the website does not want to be known?  Tough.  They do not get a state granted business license.

Move knowledge (or mandatory related links) of Beneficial Ownership of business entities profit or non-profit to the website of every commercial entity to its mandatory "About Us" link on its home page.

An AI crawler can then generate the knowledge necessary to control the Capitalist economy.  Publicly accessible knowledge that is the ultimate check on the integrity of our human created Artificial Intelligence systems designed to serve us.

The AI Crawler must be blockchain based for all changes to "Who" an entity is as described by its "About Us" legally mandated information such as "Beneficial Ownership" and its "Accounting Activity" in the Block Chain Monetary System establishing what amounts to an audit trail of change leading to the current identity.

Privacy?  If corporate entities can demand that humans must identify who they are by various means in order to do business with them then we, the human being entities must demand to know broad information and knowledge in an easily accessed form by ourselves and our government about the identity of the corporate entities we are dealing with.

What better ways than our government to require by law certain data, information and knowledge be available, directly or by link, in the corporate entity website.  The corporate entity website becomes licensed by the government subject to governance standards (the law).

We are becoming more aware of standard setting entities and gate keepers for those standards.  The government (We the People)  is a standard setting entity.  Standards set by the government are often privatized to the private domain.  Perhaps a governing standard for such things as "Beneficial Ownership" should be mandatory in a corporate domain (.com) website.  After it is established then maintenance and enforcement could be privatized.  If a corporate entity does not comply with the standard then it does not get a .com license?

Much of the "License to Operate" function  of government applicable to .com entities could be outsourced to standard setting entities (give them an identifier of .std?)  Their performance could easily be monitored by government AI agencies (the new NSA?)

In this "Us" vs "Them" world I suggest that we make "Them", the corporate entities of Capitalism, check off the the block that they have read and agree with the terms and conditions applicable to obtaining a .com website so that we know, just like they do the identity of who we are dealing with in terms of Beneficial Owners and other specific data elements and information.

They check the block "Don't Agree"?  End of story.  Do not pass go.  Do not get a .com website.  Go to the old school of soliciting and conducting business outside the World Wide Web.

Artificial Intelligence to assure compliance, similar to a smart contract should be the public domain tool to assure continued compliance with governance standards in the terms and conditions.  In cases of non-compliance .com entities will be branded as non- compliance or, as necessary, their .com license revoked.  They remain at liberty in this free country to do business as they wish in accordance with the law.  Just not on the World Wide Web.

The World Wide Web is Tim Berners Lee gift to the world.

We own it?  If we own it, our government owns it as well as the right granted by us to the government related to our general welfare?

What kind of government do we have?  A republic if we can keep it.  There are a lot of riffs on that if the terms are googled.

Long single sentence follows:

Wouldn't the philosophy of free private enterprise and market rules just love shifting governance to standards setting private domain entities and limiting the role of Government to background monitoring of performance and enforcing the law from its bath tub via standard setting entities establishing and enforcing .com Information System structure, mandatory data element website content, operation and compliance through an Artificial Intelligence watch dog continuously crawling the World Wide Web?