Things Do Not Move In A Virtual World

The subject line is an interesting point of view that deserves some analysis.

A core concept of my digital, uniquely serialized, dollar each with a value of one dollar is that the virtual dollar is static.  The dollar does not move in a transaction.  Only the owner of each single fixed central dollar record with a value of one dollar changes.

This concept is an extension to the thoughts in recent prior blog entries.  However it looks at the concept from a more fundamental view point.

Things in the real world move.  It is an essential physical property behavior of every Thing in the ObjectClass:RealThing.  We perceive things with this property of behavior called Move.  Some things move at a greater rate than others and become more perceived and defined in terms of their movement from place to place by most people.

Things in the virtual world of our minds are our conceptual representations of the real world  and conceptual abstractions of things that do not have real world physical substance.  Perhaps all we know them by is their behavior.  I walk around with the virtual representation of the real and conceptual world not just on my mind but in my mind.  I move but it does not.  Thoughts my float around in my mind but they are messages from one thing in my mind to another transmitted over connectors.

What if I made a paradigm shift from thoughts racing around in my head from place to place to viewing thoughts as granular thing fragments at the lowest level but structured to higher levels of abstraction that talk to each other by passing messages between them.  Sounds like talking to myself!

Bingo!  Did I just discover the Object Oriented Paradigm?  Or did it just shift to a new paradigm view of it where everything is perceived in a totally different way.  Did the face that shifted to a face then shift to another thing that emerged in an instant (instance) of shift?

The new thing I now see?

Virtual conceptual abstract things do not move.  Their behavior associstions change based on messages passed between them and the current state of the thing.

For example: Email is a virtual conceptual high level of abstraction thing.  "Sending" an email is the perception of going from one place to another which is the common view email.  The paradigm shift is that email is a conceptual object that is not sent anywhere.  Once created it resides only in my sent file.  What the receiver sees is a mirror image and only a mirror image as a function of communication.  The email itself never moved.  Essentially, an instantaneous view of the email I created was granted to  recipient and that snapshot view was captured and retained.  In that same instant my email communicated a new state to my email program by state change from draft to sent.  It never "went' from my draft to sent file.  It never really went anywhere.  Virtual objects in a conceptual world never move!

A new way of looking at things but what secret sauce does this paradigm shift bring to the party?

A new system architecture model for an object oriented M2 monetary system.  A model where money does not move but the messages that it receives and sends do.  It only receives and sends messages with an equally uniquely identified Account that it is associated with.  The power of money is therefore conveyed by an action from account to account.  That is the "flow theory of money".  Money as an object is not conveyed from account to account.  Money itself does not flow but the crucial flaw in the system is that we view the virtual object of money as changing hands locked with its conceptual representation.  As tightly locked as the binding between a physical paper object dollar bill and its conceptual identity.  Paper dollar bills go hand in hand with their conceptual identity from hand to hand of owners.  Virtual digital serialized debt free dollars do  not move.  They have no association with a physical object and therefore are logically detatched from that attribute of physical things.  They do not have to move to do what they do because of what they essentially are: Conceptual abstract objects.

Our monetary system is as old school as data processing where movement of processing was first and foremost.  Information Age is data processing version 3.0 where Object Orientation dominates Processing Orientation.  It is a paradigm shift that the monetary system has yet to make.

Bankster had the object oriented view of money not moving and established the model long ago.  The gold stays in their vaults.  An account associated with that gold had fractional relationship to it.  Never let the gold out of the vault.  Gold was the power, not its numerical value association expressed in an account.  Now all power of money is invested in the account.   The M2 Money account.  The only "thing" in the vault is a conceptual representation of money called debt at the macro level.

This is a fact:  Savings in all M2 accounts equals National debt (plus or minus some categorical lesser qualifications that do not otherwise make this basic statement false, it is much more true than false).

National Debt is in fact "money in the bank" but not in any bank vault.  Money held hostage by the banksters system that put it in the hands of bond holders where it is not M2 money but its "to the dollar" counter part in a different account because money was "moved" from one account to another as a function of a debt/asset "state"change.  Like hostage taking in the recent government debt crises where Republican politicians are bankster proxies to a greater extent than the Democrat proxies.

There really is no money "Object" in our monetary system.  What we perceive of "money" is only the state of a number in an account in a balance sheet accounting system where the two states are debit and credit and by virtue of the nature of debt on which the system model is based they are always equal.

In the debt free model I propose the total of all debt free M2 monetary units with a value of one in the "virtual vault" equals their associated value as the total of all on hand balances in all Accounts.  Money never moves nor does Account.  Money and Account only pass messages based on transactions that are a function of the User of money documented by account.

Ultimately all users of the power of the on hand balance of M2 money in their account are also interfacing with a Money record that is a fixed total money consolidation check and balance record that keeps track of who thru account all the money power is associated with.

The Money Model is the debt free serialized dollar each with a value of one.  That is the focus of Money Model logic.  There is no power in the medium of exchange.

What Money does, the power of money at the disposal of a User Owner, is the focus of the Account Model logic.

Money in the vault is Money.

Money in the bank is an Account.

In the current monetary system there is no money in the vault.  The vault is the National Debt.  The National Debt must be converted to the National Asset in order to make Money an object to be managed in an Object oriented Model rather than a conditional debt relationship that is the foundation for a Process Oriented Model.